Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,939   Posts: 1,557,400   Online: 976
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    mryoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Land of the Summer People, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    71

    Yashica-A v Lubitel 2

    Hey all, bought a new camera a few days ago, i got a
    Yashica-A,
    I wacked a film through it taking a few "snaps" in the garden here
    to make sure it was working and didn't leak light etc: etc: and its great


    Alex


    Katie

    Now compare this to my Lubitel 2
    Both Films Fuji Acros 100 dev'ed in R09 (Rodinal) the same way (stand developed for 1 hour @ 1:100)
    Both developed to paper the same way, but wow what a difference ??


    Alex-Lubitel-Poor


    How can 2 really similar camera's be so different ?
    All comments are very welcome
    When your dead, None of this Matters.
    Film- Nikon F65, Sigma 28-80mm Macro Lens, Canon EOS 50E with Canon 28 - 80mm Lens
    Yashica-A (my new fav)

  2. #2
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,289
    Similar? Like a "Diana Mini" is similar to a Leica M3

  3. #3
    mryoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Land of the Summer People, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    71
    LOL only a 5k difference
    So how are they different ?
    I see 2 lens on both, the taking lens are both 3 piece's i have read
    The Lubitel viewer is way better than the dark old Yashica-A, although the magnifier on the Yashica is loads bigger,
    Seems i am missing something ? lol
    When your dead, None of this Matters.
    Film- Nikon F65, Sigma 28-80mm Macro Lens, Canon EOS 50E with Canon 28 - 80mm Lens
    Yashica-A (my new fav)

  4. #4
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,289
    Seriously though that picture you posted taken with the Lubitel is probably printed from an underexposed negative. That is why it looks poor. I'll admit you are correct about the lenses. I had thought the Yashica A shared the 4 element Yashinon of the other Yashica TLRs but was wrong.

  5. #5
    mryoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Land of the Summer People, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    71
    You may be right about the Lubitel pic, it is kinda poor lol
    I spose you gel with something and this time its me and the Yashica,
    The negatives are the best i have seen in the short time (3 months) we have been
    home deving and printing, i am very impressed with it
    Last edited by mryoda; 07-21-2012 at 08:52 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    When your dead, None of this Matters.
    Film- Nikon F65, Sigma 28-80mm Macro Lens, Canon EOS 50E with Canon 28 - 80mm Lens
    Yashica-A (my new fav)

  6. #6
    Wade D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Jamul, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    884
    Images
    3
    My 1st TLR was a Ciro Flex in the early 70's. Then I bought a Yashica D in 1978. It is still my go-to camera for MF. It's always been reliable and a joy to use. I know you will get to like your Yashica A very quickly.
    Your pictures look great for just starting out with home processing.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    505
    Images
    35
    For what it's worth, my first TLR was a Lubitel, and I had pretty decent results with it. It does benefit from a lens hood [I made one by cutting down a 35mm film canister]. Certainly better than your example shot. Not that I'm disputing your results, and the Yashica shots are great, but I found with mine I had less of an obvious disparity in results between the Lubitel and higher quality cameras. A couple of my favourite early shots were from the Lubitel, and I have the prints in a frame to remind me.

    That said, Japanese or German TLRs are a big step up mechanically and optically.

  8. #8
    mryoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Land of the Summer People, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    71
    Thanks for the comments Wade, The first thing that struck me was the weight
    Quite heavy and well built, its a keeper, i bought it because i put 2 rolls through the Lubitel
    and both were poor (as above), the only decent pic was on "B" a 1 min exposure of cars tail lights on the Motorway (highway)


    Light

    Thanks mcgrattan
    I am glad you had more luck than i with the Lubitel
    Its a shame, i liked it when i bought it and the viewfinder is really nice and bright,
    but for some reason i can't take a decent shot with it.
    Mines made from Bakelite and looks like new, there isn't a scratch on it, only prob with it is the
    self timer, it won't run,
    Anyway it only cost me £6.51 ($10 ish) so it's not a huge loss
    I would have liked a Rollei of some description, but the price of a clean one is way out of my league

    Last edited by mryoda; 07-21-2012 at 09:01 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    When your dead, None of this Matters.
    Film- Nikon F65, Sigma 28-80mm Macro Lens, Canon EOS 50E with Canon 28 - 80mm Lens
    Yashica-A (my new fav)

  9. #9
    JPD
    JPD is offline
    JPD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    772
    The Yashica A is basically a simpler copy of the german Rolleicord. It has a real matte screen viewfinder and a unit focusing triplet lens (Yashimar = OK, Yashikor = Very Good), and the four speed shutter is often surprisingly reliable after all these years.

    The Lubitel 2 is a copy of the german Voigtländer Brillant (much simpler and cheaper than the Rolleicord). The viewfinder is only a mirror and a magnifying glass (with a little matte spot in the center to aid for focusing). The lens is a cheap front cell focusing triplet. It's more of an advanced box camera than a real TLR.

    The Yashica A with Yashikor is a good TLR for beginners. The lens is beautifully soft wide open, and surprisingly sharp stopped down to 8-16.

    My grandfather had the early Yashica A with Yashimar lens, and it was the first TLR I used. I liked the grain free prints. Then a local photo shop had a used Rolleiflex for sale. I bought it, and I was blown away buy the quality and sharpness.
    J. Patric Dahlén

  10. #10
    mryoda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Land of the Summer People, UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    71
    Just had a good look over the Camera and my Lenses are Yashikor
    So i think that means its the better lens for this camera ? its also a grey coloured model if that makes a difference ?

    Thanks for the info its interesting, i love this older stuff,
    Since returning to film i seem to have stopped using my digital cameras, its strange, when i look at
    my digital kit, i kinda of pull a Grrr! face lol
    My only regret is not having learned to develop and print 20 odd years ago
    Oh well, i am 45 now so plenty years left to get better
    When your dead, None of this Matters.
    Film- Nikon F65, Sigma 28-80mm Macro Lens, Canon EOS 50E with Canon 28 - 80mm Lens
    Yashica-A (my new fav)

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin