Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,550   Posts: 1,544,748   Online: 958
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    93

    Pentax 67, reliability.

    Pretty much decided on the Pentax 67 over RZ 67. Went to my favourite camera shop in Melbourne, Camera Exchange and put a roll through one. It jammed twice. Not a big deal, easily fixed by pushing a little button on the front,but made me think. Called the Camera Clinic and was told that they can't get parts for it anymore, but service is not a problem. Apparently the only one they can still get parts for is the RZ 67. I know the Pentax will probably be OK, maybe it just needed some action (it had a new battery BTW), but it put a bit of doubt in my head. I know any of them can break down and I shouldn't rely on a single camera to do a project abroad, but ...
    What's the reliability record for P67?

    Cheers, Wojtek.

  2. #2
    Chrismat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Brewer, Maine
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    500
    I can only speak for mine. I bought it in 1983 and it is still going strong. I have gone through long periods during that time where I didn't do much photography at all but whenever I've brought it out it's always worked fine. I did have to send it in to Pentax for a minor repair in 1998, I had dropped it from a short distance and caused a dent on the front just below the shutter release. I have a roll of 220 Portra in it now and I will be taking it out this weekend. Eric Hendrickson in the U.S. works on Pentax and he also works on the P67, you might want contact him. It's a long distance but his work is great.

    pentaxs.com

    Chris

  3. #3
    Poisson Du Jour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    SE Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,580
    Images
    15
    The 67, and its earlier incarnation, the 6x7, is certainly getting on a bit in terms of age. and many, many of them the world over have seen lots of service. It's a bit of a risk to just plonk money down on any one assuming it has been well looked after, but good specimens can be found. Models date from 1969 to 1989-1990 (when the updated 67 came out). How they are treated plays a role in reliability, especially if the shutter curtain is prodded, or somebody has carried out mechanical probing of stuck mirror (easily reset without physical coercion!). I avoid any camera with pronounced dents or damage, especially to prisms (and dents and scrapes are common on 6x7 and 67 bodies that have been in professional service). There's not much electronics in either camera save for the TTL meter prism. I guess like old dogs they will hobble along til the very last, faithful to the master before expiring — midway through a precious roll of film, and thus you beginneth a fumblefest, in a cold and dark place, to extricate your prized film from the beastie without incurring any trauma to that big shutter curtain... Things like light seals around the back cover and TTL prism can be done yourself with light seals readily available ex USA on eBay.

    It has been reported that if the shutter is left cocked for a prolonged period of time, then shutter speeds will become inaccurate. So obviously it's a good idea not to mothball a 67 / 6x7, but put it to good, solid use and look upon it as a faithful servant, probably with a long and adventurous previous life.

    I purchased my 67, minty, from a deceased estate in California (so a looong flight to Australia!) and was told by the dealer that it had received very little non-professional use. Michaels Cameras had a 67 in good condition but it had a jammed shutter and scratchy winding lever. But I was after the 90mm f2.8 attached to it: unfortunately, I was not successful in persistently arm-bending them to part with "just the lens, please!"...
    .::Gary Rowan Higgins

    A comfort zone is a wonderful place. But nothing ever grows there.
    —Anon.






  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Sydney
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,350
    Images
    84
    I haven't had any problems with mine. I know the shutter is battery dependent and it won't work with a bad battery. Mirror sticks in the up position from memory. I would be wary about buying one with a fresh battery that is playing up. Do you get a return option if you buy from this shop?

  5. #5
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,048
    Images
    38
    They have always had the reputation of being very durable work horses but as said before it depends on how it is treated.
    I have had my 67 since buying it lightly used in 1994 and it is still a tight, good looking, good working camera.
    However I treat my equipment well.
    Dennis

  6. #6
    coigach's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Inverness-shire, Scotland
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,485
    Images
    71
    I've had a 67II for about 10 years and found it to be very reliable. I've heavily used in that time. Only one issue, and that was when tripod blew over on a mountainside and the impact of camera hitting ground made the shutter curtain jam. Quick CLA and all was well...!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    93
    Thanks Guys. I'll just have to find a good one. Wish me luck.

    ps. Just about to scan the roll I shot at the shop.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    St. Louis, Mo.
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    849
    A good friend of mine has a Pentax 67. I've known him for over 20 years and he had it before I met him. He has never had a problem with it.

  9. #9
    jovo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Jacksonville, Florida
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,085
    Images
    191
    I've had my P67 since the late 90's, and love it. I've gradually built a kit of lenses 55, 105, 135, 200, and 300, and they're as rugged and reliable as the camera. Even though I was tempted to acquire a Hassie, I stayed with the 6x7 because the negative can obviously be cropped to square, but keeps the option of the rectangle. I hope you find one more reliable than what you were looking at...it's a terrific camera system.
    John Voss

    My Blog

  10. #10
    Brian C. Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Everett, WA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    495
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    13
    If you found one that's jamming, then go find a better body. Mine is a 6x7, and I bought it in the late 1990s and I've put lots of rolls through it. I did send it in for a CLA and replace the light seals, and it's still working just fine. I love the camera, and I suppose that when it dies I'll have to buy another Pentax. It's always been a reliable machine for me.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin