|
|
|
-
Whatever, they must think film will be around for a while or they wouldn't invest the money in new cameras. Lomography has an article too: http://www.lomography.com/magazine/n...s_sidebar_text
Rollei does market film under their name. I don't know who makes it, but maybe they will invest in Kodak's film line. Any way that works if fine with me - I just like film better than digital.
-
> Rollei does market film under their name.
That is not the camera company. The name Rollei was bought by Maco. This company doen not produce fillms. It sells respooled aerographic and traffic films, and may be some other types, using the name Rollei.
-
 Originally Posted by piu58
> Rollei does market film under their name.
That is not the camera company. The name Rollei was bought by Maco. This company doen not produce fillms.
Hello Uwe,
it is different, a bit more complicated:
The current owner of the Rollei brand name is RCP-Technik:
http://www.rcp-technik.com/typo3/ind...ollei-home&L=1
They license the Rollei name to Maco Photo Products for films, paper, chemistry
and license the Rolleiflex name to
DHW Fototechnik (the former original Rollei / Franke&Heidecke in Brunswick, Lower Saxony, Germany) http://www.dhw-fototechnik.de/ .
Best regards,
Henning
-
Does anyone know about when this camera hits the market,
and at what price?
-
As for the FXn I would guess price comparable to the existing FX. E.g. >$5000
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
Hello Dennis,
I've been at Photokina and had a long and very interesting talk about the new cameras with Mr Schönrock of DHW at their booth.
 Originally Posted by dpurdy
I think I figured out what they did. I think they adapted the 80mm lens to the FT focus mechanism and front. That gives it just a bit more extension which allows a bit closer focus.
Well yes, the current FX has a new focus machanism which allows a closer minimal focus. The new focus mechanism is similar to the one used in the Tele-Rolleiflex FT.
The optical design of the lens is the same (Planar).
The new lens name "S-Apogon" is now used because the licence agreement had expired.
The demand for the Rolleiflex TLRs has been very stable over the years, and is recently just slightly increasing. The highest demand comes from Asia, especially from Japan, where these cameras have always been very popular.
DHW has been very satiesfied with the interest for their products at Photokina. Interest was much better than expected. For the new, improved Hy6, too.
He told me that about 35% of the Hy6 customers are (also) using the Hy6 with film.
Best regards,
Henning
-
It looks in the pictures that the FX-N is bay 4. Is that true?
Now my brown leather FX is just another old Rollei!
Dennis
Thanks for the info Henning.
-
Couldn't agree more!! Love shooting my T model. It blows the doors off of any main stream digi.
ToddB
-
 Originally Posted by dpurdy
It looks in the pictures that the FX-N is bay 4. Is that true?
I think the reason for using Bayonet IV is that the front is of the same type as on the Tele and it extends a bit further out, so the lens is deeper inside the front. Bayonet III would cause vignetting.
|
|