Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,276   Posts: 1,534,744   Online: 911
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
  1. #11
    Helinophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    562
    Images
    20
    IIIIh....!

    No, don't say E's and such.....aargh, now I gotto start my thinking all over again!

    Thanks for great tips and links ^^
    -
    "Nice picture, you must have an amazing camera."
    Visit my photography blog at: http://helino-photo.blogspot.com

  2. #12
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,905
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Helinophoto View Post
    IIIIh....!

    No, don't say E's and such.....aargh, now I gotto start my thinking all over again!

    Thanks for great tips and links ^^
    The D is pretty uncommon but if you found one in good shape no reason not to grab it. The E's are extremely similar to the F just slightly older and the E2 and E3 have interchangeable screens, as mentioned.

    It's the C that has some plastic parts and differing (but minor) controls but certainly not to be scoffed at, again if in good condition. My 2.8C Xenotar is by far my most clean and best-conditioned Rolleiflex I own. My 3.5E3 Xenotar the "roughest" but a joy to use. And my 2.8E Planar (snagged in a Beijing alley antique shop for $150 back in 1999, it's been through heck) has minor fine scratches on the shooting lens but the slightly more moderate contrast as a result makes it my fav of all for portraits, and with a hood and not shooting into the sun is a match in every way to any of the others. All shoot great images. There's little research to be done other than paying the right price (see link above) and finding one in good condition. For some reason the F's are more in demand and go for more yet the others fantastic shooters.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  3. #13
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,043
    Images
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by Helinophoto View Post
    Hi

    I am in the marked for a Rolleiflex and I am currently looking for a Rolleiflex model 2.8F incarnation.

    I see on the "Date my rollei" page that the "last" Rolleiflex 2.8F series started in 1969 ( http://www.rolleirepairs.com/models.htm ).

    What I don't quite understand is; How _long_ was this line produced, before being replaced? (was it replaced by the GX and FX?)
    While scanning eBay, I've yet to find a Rolleiflex from the 70's, 80's or 90's (what is the name of the models produced then?), I only find stuff from the 40's to late 60's.

    I am, off course, looking for a camera in good working and good cosmetic condition, but I am not looking for a piece to display in my living-room, I actually plan to shoot with the thing.
    Looks like a reasonable price to pay for a version from the 60's is around €1200-€1500 in Europe, depending on condition and accessories I suppose? (after comparing prices)

    So, I'm thinking that newer is always better, as long as the condition is good........or is it?

    I was planning to go for the Planar version, although I get from various discussions that xenotar may be just as sharp (or even sharper some say).

    I like the look of the Classic 2.8F, but why aren't there any Rolleiflex 2.8Fs' around for sale from the 70's, 80's and 90's ?
    - Did rolleiflex quit the whole thing between 1970 and 2000-something, when they came out with the GX version?

    Any Rollei-nerds around with some clarification on this?
    The Rolleiflex production fell of dramatically in the late 60s as news photographers all went to 35mm as well as wedding photographers. Studio photographers using 120 would generally use hasselblad. There was still some production though. If you see the serial number that starts with 295...... it is from the mid to late 70s even to the very early 1980s. At that point Rollei started making a lot of collector cameras and especially expensive cameras... the Platin and the Aurum and GXs commemorating years as well as GXs intended for use. In the early 2000s or maybe very late 1990s they started making the FX very expensive but intended for the most part to be used. The Asian market became the top market for Rolleis and is to this day with the new FX-N, FT and FW which are all still available new. I am not sure if the recently introduced FX-N means that the previous FX is ended. Certainly the new FX is still available from dealers.
    If you want to buy a Rollei and you don't care about a removable finder and using a prism then condition is the issue more than model. The lenses remain the same until the HFT coating on the Platin and the GX/FX. The meter is drastically improved starting with the GX but it is electronic and needs a battery. Otherwise the older F every bit the camera and arguably more than the FX since the FX has no self timer and no locking pc connector.
    So if all you care about is the single coated lens and waist level finder then you might as well save yourself some money and get an E or even older. Condition is everything in that regard.

  4. #14
    Helinophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    562
    Images
    20
    Alright, this became a little difficult, I did look around a little more to see what was out there concerning the E version.
    I did see some E's out there (and even an overpriced F from the 70's in Hong-Kong), but they were almost at the same price-level as the F's I've seen (especially in good condition), and then I stumbled over this one:

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/170826544940...940%26_rdc%3D1

    £ 1181 or €1475 or $1886, depending on what you use.

    And I bought that. I like the price/condition combination, but I also like the fact that it comes with a few accessories as well, most other stuff I've seen on-line is just the camera, nothing else. (not even straps or covers).

    Hopefully the camera is in as good a shape as the seller claims, the scuff-mark on the meter and a few marks on the metal edges on the back is ok by me, as long as everything works nicely, glass is clean and the body over-all is in nice condition. (I'm buying the camera to be used, as previously mentioned, if it was super-mint, I would just get all anal about using it).

    The seller is also reputable, so it _should be_ pretty safe and as-is and no fuss, lets hope.

    I like the idea of having the option for f2.8 if I need it, also, the lens should be a bit sharper and more contrasty at f3.5 than a native f3.5 rollei, wide open at f3.5.

    (my gut also wanted the 2.8F the most, hard to explain, my brain does understand that the E's are probably just as good, but still....you know how it can be ).

    Looking forward to try it out, that's for sure!
    Last edited by Helinophoto; 11-06-2012 at 06:54 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    -
    "Nice picture, you must have an amazing camera."
    Visit my photography blog at: http://helino-photo.blogspot.com

  5. #15
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,043
    Images
    38
    Beautiful! Well done. Good that you got the lens shade and cap as well.
    That is an early version 2.8F with the half moon strap connector and real leather covering rather than the later leatherette.
    It looks like it was hardly used at all. If it needs new lube and adjustment it is definitely worth it. Make it like a new camera.
    Congratulations.
    The only problem is that now you don't get to spend months pouring over ebay ads to find the cheapest deal.

    Dennis

  6. #16
    RobertoMiglioli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    São Paulo, Brazil
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    64
    I was going to give my thoughts untill I read you already purchased a Rolleiflex. Congratulations. Eager to see some pictures soon.

  7. #17
    Helinophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    562
    Images
    20
    (Update)

    Finally, after four seasons and two decades in the customs department, I received my camera.

    Indeed, a very nice specimen, looks very clean and esthetically very nice.

    However, it seems like the camera has been sitting around for a while, so I need to send it for a CLA (the film-feeder feeling mechanism isn't triggering on Acros or Tri-X, only Fomapan), this isn't really unexpected at all so......next step is to try and find a service-person with a pretty quick turnaround. Harry Flenoor has a 11 week turnaround and although he is probably _the guy_, I'm currently checking out a few faster alternatives. (nothing wrong with the camera really, just need a cleaning up AFAIK).

    Anyway, the ever-ready case, filters and the lens shade was all in very very nice condition as well, the original diffuser for the light meter was included under the flap in the ever-ready case and I also have straps both for the case and if I want to use the camera without the case, so I feel that I have a really nice package here. Looks like the previous owner took really good care of his camera =)
    -
    "Nice picture, you must have an amazing camera."
    Visit my photography blog at: http://helino-photo.blogspot.com

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    535
    Is everything else working? Have you been able to shoot and develop any film? A quick, temporary fix for the film trigger that sometimes works: put a layer of tape around the upper feeler roller. This increases its 'sensitivity' and can make it trip for thinner emulsions. No answer in the long run but it will let you test out the rest of the camera if it works.

  9. #19
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,905
    Images
    1

    Aahh.....! Which Rolleiflex 2.8F to buy?

    You just obtained yourself an absolute masterpiece that can last you a lifetime. Do not skimp on service or let slight impatience rule you. Send it to Harry and have it fully looked over and everything fixed, lubricated and adjusted by the absolute best. Take it from me: someone who for years used others due to impatience and to save a few bucks only to send most of my Rolleiflexes to Harry in the end when those same cameras developed issues or problems not found or simply not done well by others. Wish I'd just done that in the first place. Would have saved a lot of time, frustration and money.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  10. #20
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,905
    Images
    1

    Aahh.....! Which Rolleiflex 2.8F to buy?

    Forgot you're in Europe. If Jurgen can be found use him.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin