Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,898   Posts: 1,521,019   Online: 814
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Dean Taylor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33

    Mamiya 6 lenses versus 35mm SLR lenses: clarification, please

    hello--

    A noted photographer commenting upon RF lens characteristics, writes:

    "The fact that these are rangefinder lenses and can be designed without having to work around the rear lens extension interfering with an SLR mirror allows the Mamiya 6's lenses to outdo the SLR systems."

    For a newcomer to photography, please clarify the statement..

    Best,

    Dean

  2. #2
    MattKing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Delta, British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    12,057
    Images
    60
    Dean:

    If you think about it, something like a simple 43mm lens, which has a nodal point in the middle of a single element, would have to be only 43mm away from the film in order to focus to infinity. That would get awfully close to the moving mirror in a medium format SLR.

    For that reason, those who design lenses for SLRs are forced to make them retrofocus type lenses - which means that the glass elements in those lenses are actually ahead of the nodal point in the lens. Retrofocus lenses force the lens designers to make some serious compromises.

    In comparison, a rangefinder body is much easier to design for, because there is no mirror in the way.
    Matt

    “Photography is a complex and fluid medium, and its many factors are not applied in simple sequence. Rather, the process may be likened to the art of the juggler in keeping many balls in the air at one time!”

    Ansel Adams, from the introduction to The Negative - The New Ansel Adams Photography Series / Book 2

  3. #3
    MDR
    MDR is offline
    MDR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,041
    Retrofocus = inverted tele not really wide angle lens designs in the purest sense of the word. A good retrofocus design is not much worse than it's non retrofocus sibling but it's a much more complicated design and more things can go wrong at the assembly or later stages. The Mamiya 6 is a superb camera its 6x7 sister is supposed to have the sharpest MF lenses in existance, since it's mostly used handheld this advantage is often lost. The advantage of the RF ends at the Normal focal length, some Normal lenses for SLRs are way sharper than their RF cousins. Another often stated advantage of the Mamiya RFs is the lack of Mirrorslap which can cause vibrations = less sharp results.

    Compared to 35mm SLR lenses the Mamiya is sometimes better and some 35mm Slr are better than the Mamiya. MF lenses usually have less resolution than their 35mm counterparts since the neg needs less enlargement.
    A Zeiss, Leica, or some Canon and Nikon lenses certainly have more sharpness and resolution than the Mamiya lenses.

    The bigger negative makes up for these shortcomings though and overall the Mamiya will create sharper images with better tonality.

    Dominik

  4. #4
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,365
    Images
    1
    the opstatement verifies my experience with my mamiya 6 exactly.the optics aren't 2nd to anything i've seen, including carl zeiss optics. i do't knoww how much that has to do with the fact that they don't needed to be calculated as retrofocus optics, since there is no mirror.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Montreal
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    414
    Images
    10
    The sharpest lens I've ever owned is the Nikkor AFD 50mm f1.8. A $25-50 lens used nowadays. The Mamiya 6, 50mm is very close but not quite there. Of course, when I print at 19 inch x 19 inch from the Mamiya it is spectacular. I've never been satisfied with anything larger than 5x7 from 35mm negatives (after I saw what the mamiya could do).

  6. #6
    John cox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Ontario Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    52
    Quote Originally Posted by RalphLambrecht View Post
    the opstatement verifies my experience with my mamiya 6 exactly.the optics aren't 2nd to anything i've seen, including carl zeiss optics. i do't knoww how much that has to do with the fact that they don't needed to be calculated as retrofocus optics, since there is no mirror.
    To be fair the hasselblad SWC biogon is optimally designed (non retrofocus) and is distortion free (+ cuts titanium).

  7. #7
    RalphLambrecht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    the villages .centralflorida,USA and Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,365
    Images
    1
    sorry cutting titsniumis not one of the requirements i have in cameras.
    Regards

    Ralph W. Lambrecht
    www.darkroomagic.comrorrlambrec@ymail.com[/URL]
    www.waybeyondmonochrome.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin