Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,484   Posts: 1,644,574   Online: 1078
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 14 of 14
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,628
    The batteries do need to be measured under load.
    Sometimes they will have enough poop(techie term) to give an exposure or two but then crap out when a heavier load is needed. 4S=OK 8S=NOT.
    Sometimes with warmth and rest they'll sorta kinda temporarily recover, then relapse to the dead mode.
    Expletive Deleted!

  2. #12
    lxdude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Redlands, So. Calif.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,857
    Quote Originally Posted by John Koehrer View Post
    Sometimes they will have enough poop... but then crap out when a heavier load is needed.
    Discovered through the process of elimination...
    I do use a digital device in my photographic pursuits when necessary.
    When someone rags on me for using film, I use a middle digit, upraised.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    132
    Hey Dave,

    First off, thanks for all the sleuthing on my behalf.

    I'm not certain it's 1/500 of a sec but from my *ears* it sounds like it's opening/closing as fast as possible. I agree that if 4 seconds should work, why not eight? I think the AE1 prism finder is drawing more load from the batteries (at once) that they can handle. Really the only logical explanation...Yes there are several leds in the viewfinder of the prism finder including shutter speeds and < arrows (if the exposure it outside of the capacity of the prism finder). Again, if I remove the prism finder, 8S works fine. It's not *really* a big deal to me especially considering I am generally shooting night shots at f11 or >, simply dropping it back to f8 to get 4s isn't a big deal to me. Finally, I can use a cable release

    Interesting anecdote to my Bronica issue is that there is a current trend "online" to shoot square images (e.g. Instagram of whom *forces* you go crop your images square before posting). When I post these images my "digital" friends invariably ask me to add them as a "friend" on Instagram I've been confused more than once when I see this 25 year old barista/club girl post pictures on Facebook with "rvp100" apparently listed on the "film" edge markers. Turns out that Instagram spits out borders for photographs that look like they were scanned film. I was fairly certain she wasn't shooting Velvia 100 in square format in a dark club

    Thanks again Dave.

  4. #14
    DWThomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,432
    Images
    72
    Ah, glad I may have been some help. I own 3 SQ-A bodies, one with an unhappy shutter release, and 50, 65, 80 and 110 1:1 macro PS lenses that I hope to be able to keep going with for a decade or two, but there isn't (that I've been able to find) much info around on what goes on inside the boxes. Someone pointed me to a service manual .pdf file for an ETRSi, which I downloaded, but it doesn't appear to cover anything but the body itself, which is only a portion of what's happening.

    The combination of irregularities you describe doesn't quite make sense to me, weighed against what I 'think' I understand about the little buggers, but that may mean, Zeus forfend, that my understanding is incorrect -- not that that has ever happened before .... Hopefully APUG may become a 'knowledge base' for some of this stuff as time goes by and we decipher things.

    I suspect that some "data parameters" might be communicated via analog current or voltage in these beasties, since the design is pretty old. There are only a few contacts connecting the back and viewfinder to the body, implying a serial communication, although I guess it could be some sort of crude digital as opposed to analog serial hookup. I'm thinking an analog method might rack up extra current drain at one extreme or the other for ISO and light measurement. As a long time tinkerer in many fields, both hobby and professional, I own an oscilloscope and a few other things that might permit some deeper investigation -- "one of these days."

    I often tell myself "sometime in the winter, when it's too cold to be doing stuff outside, I'll dig into [insert object here]" but here it is February and I've got a million things going on. (Maybe I need to switch to "summer when it's too hot to ...")

    Anyway, good luck with it.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin