Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,206   Posts: 1,531,881   Online: 1050
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22

    Hi : ) !!! - Hasselblad 50 mm. Distagon C questions

    Hi,

    I am being offered a Hasselblad Distagon 50 mm lens, C version.

    The serial number is 3879126. I wonder how old this lens may
    be. I tried a webpage from a Historical Hasselblad Society, but
    the website wasn't working and I didn't get a production year.

    The other question I have, I wonder how good the performance of
    such a lens may be on both a Hasselblad body, as well as on a dSLR?

    Last, but not least, what would be an appropiate price for such a lens.
    Please feel free to post a price in your currency.

    Thank you in advance, kind regards,

    igmolinav : ) !!!

  2. #2
    Kevin Caulfield's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,097
    Blog Entries
    5
    Images
    52
    Juts checked it for you. It is 1965.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22
    Hi,

    Thank you Kevin : ) !!!

    Do you guys know how well would this
    lens perform or its approximate price?

    Kind regards,

    igmolinav

  4. #4
    cjbecker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    IN
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    734
    Images
    19
    Even though hasselblad ziess lenses are amazing they do not resolve the amount that a 35mm lens does. They do give a different feel then your typical 35mm lens though. I will say, if I ever get a 35mm again I will be using all my hasselblad lenses on it and only using them.

    The only thing I would say to do us check keh.com for a good price. I'm on my phone so it all a pain in the butt to do.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22
    Hi,

    You mean, the performance on 35 mm. should be amazing?!

    Thank you, kind regards,

    igmolinav : ) !!!

  6. #6
    cjbecker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    IN
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    734
    Images
    19
    It looks like a Bgn condition will run 300 and 500 for a good version. On a medium format camera I will be a good lens. Many great photographs were taken with that lens.

  7. #7
    Slixtiesix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    717
    Images
    21
    I have the old 50/4 Distagon for my Rolleiflex SL66 (same as Hasselblad) and once stopped down to f8 or f11 the performance really convinced me. I did not expect it to be that good. At f4 and f5,6 it is softer, especially when used for close ups. Used in the 1m range at full aperture it is very soft! Superbly sharp and contrasty if used at f8 or f11 at wider distance. I found it even better than my 80/2,8 for that. I was also amazed about the high contrast and colour saturation though mine is only single coated.
    Have a look on my Gallery, there are some pictures taken with it.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22
    Hi,

    Thank you for your messages : ) !!!

    It looks like a Bgn condition will run 300 and 500 for a good version.
    You mean between 300 USD and 500 USD?

    On a medium format camera it will be a good lens.
    And on a 35 mm. dSLR?

    Used in the 1m range at full aperture it is very soft! Superbly sharp and
    contrasty if used at f8 or f11 at wider distance. I found it even better
    than my 80/2,8 for that.
    At f/4 for a sharply focused half-body or
    full body portrait I assume that what one may have in focus will be tack sharp,
    and the foreground and background very blurred! (This, I assume again but don't
    know for certain, is perhaps regardless of the camera used, either a Hasselblad or
    a dSLR).

    Thank you again, kind regards,

    igmolinav : ) !!!

  9. #9
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,056
    The 50mm lens that you are thinking about is a C lens. C lenses use B-50 filters and are less ergonomic than the newer lenses. The CF and newer lenses use B-60 filters. If you buy C lenses and CF lenses you will need two sets of pricey filters, B-50 and B-60. I strongly recommend that you only buy CF or newer lenses and avoid the C lenses. The CF lenses are the most cost efficient lenses since later models add mostly electronics and some add a front end focus adjustment [FLE]. I have not found FLE worth the additional costs.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    22
    Hi,

    If you buy C lenses and CF lenses you will need two sets of pricey filters, B-50 and B-60
    I would only buy one UV filter to protect the lens. Will it be that expensive?

    ... and some add a front end focus adjustment [FLE]. I have not found FLE worth the additional costs.
    Yeah, I saw that. What for is the FLE? What difference does it make?

    Thank you, kind regards,

    igmolinav : ) !!!

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin