Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,568   Posts: 1,573,490   Online: 759
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26

    Fuji GA645i | Partial Underexposure | Help

    I've owned a Fuji GA645i for close to five months now and it's worked flawlessly, but lately it seems to be underexposing the top 1/6th of the frame by 1-2 stops. I'm baffled, bummed, and at a loss as to what it could be. I thought perhaps the rubber hood I've been using had become bent, but that doesn't appear to be the issue. No aperture blades appear to be sticking and I'm completely out of ideas. The camera only has 1700 actuations and I can't imagine it being the shutter at that low of a count.

    Has anyone run into this before with the Fuji GA series or other cameras?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,172
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by C.Kline View Post
    I've owned a Fuji GA645i for close to five months now and it's worked flawlessly, but lately it seems to be underexposing the top 1/6th of the frame by 1-2 stops. I'm baffled, bummed, and at a loss as to what it could be. I thought perhaps the rubber hood I've been using had become bent, but that doesn't appear to be the issue. No aperture blades appear to be sticking and I'm completely out of ideas. The camera only has 1700 actuations and I can't imagine it being the shutter at that low of a count.

    Has anyone run into this before with the Fuji GA series or other cameras?
    I assume you have tried without the hood?

    How do you tell the shutter count on these cameras?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    36
    Is there any "shape" of the underexposed area? GA645 has a leaf shutter, so maybe it's the shutter?

  4. #4
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area (Albany, California)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,160
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by RattyMouse View Post

    How do you tell the shutter count on these cameras?
    Hold down the +/- button while turning the selector dial from OFF to ISO. The count will appear in your top LCD.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    623
    Take off the hood, and any other accessories which may be getting in the way. Shoot a roll of C41 film and get it processed at a different lab to usual. This will rule out any processing issues (either with you, or your lab).

    If you can dry-fire the camera, try firing the shutter with the back open, and see if the shutter stick at all. If it's visibly underexposed, it may be visibly sticking too.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26
    Thanks for the replies everyone. I'm planning on taking the filter and hood off today and shooting it in a variety of ways (with hood and filter, hood only, filter only, and no accessories). I'll post here what I find. I'm guessing it's the combination of filter and rubber hood.

    I've shot C41 before and never noticed the problem, even with the hood, but perhaps it's the combination of the two.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26
    Alright, so I feel like I'm losing my mind now for sure. Yesterday I shot a test roll through my GA645 with varying filter/hood configurations and can't duplicate the issue I'm having. The only thing different in the tests is the film. The original roll I was having issues with was Tri-x 400 and the test roll was Arista Edu Ultra 100.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-6.jpg 
Views:	10 
Size:	681.4 KB 
ID:	68792
    GA645 | Kodak Tri-x 400 | HC110B

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-5.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	649.9 KB 
ID:	68793
    GA645 | Kodak Tri-X 400 | HC110B

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-4.jpg 
Views:	9 
Size:	767.8 KB 
ID:	68794
    GA645 | Kodak Tri-x 400 | HC110B

    All three of the above were shot with my normal combo which is a rubber lens hood on the lens with a yellow Hoya filter threaded into the hood.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-3.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	680.8 KB 
ID:	68795

    Same setup as above (Lens hood and yellow filter) | GA645 | Arista EDU Ultra 100 | HC110H

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-2.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	689.3 KB 
ID:	68796

    No filter and no lens hood | GA645 | Arista EDU Ultra 100 | HC110H

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	uploads-1.jpg 
Views:	8 
Size:	674.7 KB 
ID:	68797

    Filter only | GA645 | Arista EDU Ultra 100 | HC110H

  8. #8
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area (Albany, California)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,160
    Images
    1
    It's your dilution! Stick with H! :-)
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  9. #9
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area (Albany, California)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,160
    Images
    1
    Joking aside. Maybe you did not use enough developer in the tank with the Tri-X.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Japan
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by rich815 View Post
    Joking aside. Maybe you did not use enough developer in the tank with the Tri-X.
    You are my new hero. As stupid as it sounds there's a chance of that.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin