Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,959   Posts: 1,558,107   Online: 1118
      
Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 59 of 59
  1. #51
    polyglot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,296
    Images
    12
    For the cost of the items, it's kind of cheap. Whether it makes sense as a good kit is another matter entirely - I wouldn't buy it.

    Is the 50mm the floating version? If not, walk away right now.

    The 220 stuff is basically worthless. Do you really want 2 bodies or would you be better off with 1 body and a better lens? It's a very strange assortment of stuff to me.

  2. #52
    Poisson Du Jour's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Vic., Australia.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,632
    Images
    15
    The $450 asking price suggests this kit is heavily used and no doubt worn, with no guarantee it is operating reliability (very especially after coming from professional use).
    I would stick to 35mm and continue actively looking for a MF kit in very good condition with a reasonable amount of life remaining, so that you are not left with a bitter taste getting a worn, sub-standard system that will require you to outlay maybe twice or three times as much in repairs and overhauls. If it sounds too good to be true, no doubt it isn't. I really do not think it is worth the risk.

  3. #53
    polyglot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,296
    Images
    12
    PS go browse keh.com for an idea of the market prices. RB gear even in like-new condition is stupid-cheap; KEH was basically throwing out new-in-box RB gear last year. Seriously consider also the RZ: some better lenses, better shutter, better metering, lighter, but slightly more $$.

  4. #54

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,187
    I'll bet this is all a hoax anyway but if real.. it is a great deal for the money adn I'd snap it.. if the lenses aren't fungus eatten and the bellows are not rotted.

    as for worn.. you don't know RBs as well as I do. they can be heavily used for 40 years and still considered very usable as they have so much slak in the adjutmens provided in th emechanics you can take up a 100 years of heavy wear. daily use say school photos of hunders n hundreds of fires per day. Wear?.. it's not a Hassy!. they burn out with the same amt of useage!

    50s are most commonly floating element from the later non-C on up.

    Hey I'd buy the dam thing as parts for that price. 2 bodies makes your CLA free. Put together a second camera n sell it?.. use one bady as parts to repair the other is it is an abused camera... still says free to me!

    if the lenses are fungus eatten.. I need shutters for other better glass in my closet.. still makes it free!

    this is too good to be real.. also the OP is MIA.. yeah troll!

    so lets all day dream?


    Hey Poly. RZs are great til they break down and they go alot faster than the mechanicals.. a broken RZ is land fill! RB can be reapired even if you ahve to file your own parts from a car bumper or leaf spring.. an old car that is!

    Better shutter in RZ lenses?.. plastic disposable crap. I'd rather the old NON-C shutters.. brass and modular not riveted stamped tin junk. I laso like a nice chunk of glass not the bottom of small Coke bottle as a lens regarless of how much cheese they put on it (coatings). compare the cells n see for yourself what you are getting in the new lenses.. umm garbage!



    ahahahahahaha
    Last edited by paul ron; 06-14-2013 at 07:34 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    Anyone can make a Digital print, but only a photographer can make a photograph.

  5. #55

    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Floor-it-duh
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,154
    Images
    104
    I've decided to get it. Expect to see stuff for grabs soon.
    5x7 Eastman-Kodak kit / B&L 135mm Zeiss Tessar + Compur Deckel
    4x5 Graphic View / Schneider 180 5.6 Symmar in a Synchro Compur
    RB67 Pro S /50 4.5 / 90 3.8 / 180 4.5 / WLF / prism finder / polaback
    Random 35mm stuff

  6. #56

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,187
    Have you seen it or asked the appropiate questyions of all the points we brought up? FUNGUS.. shutters firing.. ROTTEN BELLOWS?..

    more than likely you will need seals regardless. That is a DIY project anyone can do. Goodmen sells the foam kits n has very good instructins. if you don't understand anything.. feel free to ask?

    get the manual n read it...
    http://www.butkus.org/chinon/mamiya/...rb67_pro_s.htm
    Anyone can make a Digital print, but only a photographer can make a photograph.

  7. #57

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,187
    So lets hear about this great deal?

    DID YOU GET IT YET?

    Anyone can make a Digital print, but only a photographer can make a photograph.

  8. #58
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,196
    Come on! It is time to pull the trigger. Bite the bullet; by it and report in.
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  9. #59
    ataim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    51
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Roger Cole View Post


    "still weighs quite a bit more than my 4x5 backpack with my Tech III (not an especially light field camera,) BTZS hood, spot meter, filters, three lenses, six film holders etc.
    I agree with Roger. I tossed my RB67 because of weight and bulk. A lightweight field 4x5!

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin