Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,205   Posts: 1,531,779   Online: 899
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    JoeA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14

    Nikkor 250 vs. Nikkor 180??

    Hello all,

    I recently purchased an ancient Nikkor Q Rangefinder 25cm (250mm) f4, with a Bronica mount. If my research is correct this lens is around 50+ years old.
    I took it out for the first time last weekend with a roll of Ektar 100 and I'm happy with the results.
    While this lens has really pleased me, I have a line on a 18cm (180mm) of the same vintage, possibly better, a Nikkor H at f2.5 and I am tempted.
    So, how much is to be gained with the 180 as opposed to the 250?
    They are both Rangefinder lenses with adapters, my 250 has the Bronica mount the 180 has the Nikon F mount, they would be interchangeable, affectively giving me 4 lenses, for the two formats.

    Any ideas?

    joe

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    655
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeA View Post
    Hello all,

    I recently purchased an ancient Nikkor Q Rangefinder 25cm (250mm) f4, with a Bronica mount. If my research is correct this lens is around 50+ years old.
    I took it out for the first time last weekend with a roll of Ektar 100 and I'm happy with the results.
    While this lens has really pleased me, I have a line on a 18cm (180mm) of the same vintage, possibly better, a Nikkor H at f2.5 and I am tempted.
    So, how much is to be gained with the 180 as opposed to the 250?
    They are both Rangefinder lenses with adapters, my 250 has the Bronica mount the 180 has the Nikon F mount, they would be interchangeable, affectively giving me 4 lenses, for the two formats.

    Any ideas?

    joe
    My copy of Robert Rotoloni's Nikon RF book says the 180's only peer was the 180mm f/2.8 Sonnar for the Contax. I don't know if he's speaking as a collector or as an optician, but the 180 f/2.5 H has 6 elements to the 250's 4 so, hey. (I say this with tongue firmly in cheek because I've recently seen what a 4-element 90mm Elmarit-M can do...) If you can borrow it do so and shoot a roll and compare. I'm sure there's people here who go far enough back to have used this lens or own a few copies.
    Last edited by semi-ambivalent; 08-07-2013 at 09:49 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: accuracy
    I photograph things to see what things look like photographed.
    - Garry Winogrand

  3. #3
    Trask's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,059
    Images
    6
    As a Nikon RF owner and user, and a Bronica S2/ECTL user, I'd be curious to know how good the coverage of these RF lenses is over the 6X6 format. I wish I could tell you anything about the 180mm RF lens but I've never had longer than a 135mm in Nikon RF mount. 180mm f/2.5, really? That sounds very impressive, but likely shallow depth of field so focusing it via the rangefinder built into an SP or S2 would perhaps be less than accurate. Perhaps intended for use with an external mirror box?

  4. #4
    JoeA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	16960030.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	565.9 KB 
ID:	72588

    I wasn't able to upload this last night, but I think i am today.
    Her's a sample shot with the 250 & Bronica EC.
    If I remember correctly, always a challenge, this was at f5.6.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin