Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,864   Posts: 1,583,189   Online: 749
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: Light meter

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lower Earth
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,268
    Blog Entries
    2
    Images
    32
    You don't need an expensive spot meter. Years ago I went out shooting w/ a LF photographer w/ a 4x5 camera I was experimenting with. We had our cameras loaded w/ the same color slide film, and that's pretty fussy about exposures. He pulled his super expensive Sinar w/ Nikon lens out and metered w/ an expensive spot meter (after making a lot of complicated readings). I set up my cheapo Crown Graphic w/ Kodak Ektar lens and looked at the scene, metered an appropriate bit of ground nearby w/ my $30 Sekonic reflective hand held meter, and came up w/ exactly the same readings. Ansel Adams once mentioned the same thing. After making all of his fussy zone calculations once while out w/ Edward Weston, Weston stood a while looking at things, turned here and there making a couple of quick readings, and came up w/ the same reading.

    What really hacked my friend was when we got the negs back from the lab. He couldn't tell his from mine, even though there was probably a couple of thousand dollars difference in the prices of our gear. I gave up on LF after that outing (just too slow and heavy for me), but those 4x5 transparencies were a sight to behold on a light table.

  2. #12
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,796
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    A few years back I went to a Large Format workshop and at one point we were setting up to take a shot of the leader, Per Volquartz.

    Then somebody asked anybody got a meter? Silly question.

    A moment or two later there were a great variety of meters at hand, I was the lone guy using an incident meter. There was much discussion and probably 50 or more readings taken over the next few minutes, lots of discussion about how and why and this and that and I don't remember Per saying a word (none of us were newbies).

    As I remember, in the end we all came to an essentially equivalent setting choice for the shot.

    Any metering method, when well practiced, can get you the info you need to shoot and develop your film. Both methods are fully interchangeable.

    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum216/...-metering.html
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Connecticut
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    28

    iPhone App

    Thank you Everyone for your input. I will probably head in the direction of a mid priced spot meter and play around with some cheaper incident meter options. Since I am a somewhat of a newb at this process, i don't like spending a lot until I understand my own process or needs-but still need to start somewhere.

    Yesterday, picked up my hasselblad. I researched this move for a long time and was unsure if i was making the right decision to stick with analog. After evaluating the cam and getting it home...it was the correct decision for me. It just feels right to go analog for this purpose. The 500 cm is in primo shape and for little money - seller just wanted it sold. It is a 50th anniversary edition with little time on it, time to get outside and shoot some landscape!

    Some of you mentioned the iPhone app, anyone in particular that works well?

    Thanks for the help, Rich.
    Last edited by Rtcjr; 09-08-2013 at 09:13 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    37
    Congratulations!
    The Hasselblad camera truly offers an experience larger than that of an image recording device.

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Floriduh
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,277
    Images
    2
    Just in my own experience I found that I was spending too much time taking (handheld) spot readings here and there and everywhere and trying to average them or bias them to one side or the other such that I sold the meter and made my life easier, and to tell the truth I always been right on since with an averaging meter if it was in good repair. It also helps to know if your meter does in fact meter at 18% as some don't.

    Perhaps the best in camera meter I've ever used is the rectangular patch in the FTbn series. Bias it one way or another and you know instantly the best reading for the subject.
    W.A. Crider

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Connecticut
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    28

    Experience

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom Richard View Post
    Congratulations!
    The Hasselblad camera truly offers an experience larger than that of an image recording device.

    Tom,

    Yes, the experience, that is what it is about.

    Get up early, discover places I have never been before and might not have if I didn't shoot. Then capture incredible sights using a means that is as much art as it is engineering, on a medium that is true and timeless.

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Buffalo, New York
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    228
    When I first started in MF almost 25 y/o I got a Pentax 6x7 with a plane prism and needed a meter. I chose the Gossen Luna Pro and it served me very well for many years. When they first came out, Sekonic was running a deal on their new L-508 Zoom Master meter and I picked one up for about $450. The meter got great reviews and I liked the idea of a spot meter as I had never used one before.
    Through the years I have grown to love this meter and frankly wouldn't trade it for any other. It's versatility, spot, incident and flash is unbeatable. I find that I use it about 75% of the time in incident mode, but when I need it the spot is right there. I rarely use the flash capability, but once again it is there when I need it.
    I did a search on Fleebay and was surprised that there was only one up for bid. There was about 7hrs. to go and the bid was about $225. I suspect that it will go for between $250 and $275 and it was one that was hardly used ;-)
    I like to think that the lack of 508's on the auction site is that the owners hold them dear and are unwilling to let them go.





    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

  8. #18
    markbarendt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Beaverton, OR, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,796
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    19
    Quote Originally Posted by waynecrider View Post
    Just in my own experience I found that I was spending too much time taking (handheld) spot readings here and there and everywhere and trying to average them or bias them to one side or the other such that I sold the meter and made my life easier, and to tell the truth I always been right on since with an averaging meter if it was in good repair. It also helps to know if your meter does in fact meter at 18% as some don't.

    Perhaps the best in camera meter I've ever used is the rectangular patch in the FTbn series. Bias it one way or another and you know instantly the best reading for the subject.
    Like you I now do a lot of work with the center weighted averaging meters in my various cameras.

    And yes a handheld (incident in my case) can add extra time but having an objective measurement to train myself against and match my tools to provided a huge improvement in my exposure setting skill.

    It allowed me to understand how each meter saw things, and more importantly, how they got fooled. The incident meter allowed me to "calibrate" my system across all my camera meters. In essence I learned how I had to use each meter to match the reading given by the incident meter and how to judge many situations without a meter.

    Still and yet and probably always, for situations I view as truly important, I whip out the incident meter.
    Mark Barendt, Beaverton, OR

    "We do not see things the way they are. We see things the way we are." Anaïs Nin

  9. #19
    L Gebhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    NH - Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,723
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Rtcjr View Post
    Some of you mentioned the iPhone app, anyone in particular that works well?
    I like this one: https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pock...381698089?mt=8

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    37
    Quote Originally Posted by L Gebhardt View Post
    I have used that one with good results as well as another one that looks very vintage. I have also used a fairly expensive pinhole meter (i think its french?) and the thing is that they all give me the same reading. I spent one day walking around, metering and firing off testshot with a Canon 5DmkII, i would say that 99% of the images were accurate according to the Canon meter as well as the exposures.

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin