Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,495   Posts: 1,543,026   Online: 833
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,274
    Images
    21

    Focus testing with Rollei-Infrarot infrared filter

    I recently scored myself a Bay I "Rollei-Infrarot" filter. These are Rollei's own infrared filters for their TLRs, and are widely understood to include not just filtration but also a weak lens that compensates for the IR focus shift. However, there is a lot of uncertainty about whether they always have optical compensation or only certain versions, whether the compensation is appropriate for modern near-infrared films or specific to the old HIE, and so on, so I thought I'd do some semi-controlled tests with my Rolleicord and a roll of Efke IR820.

    The filter seems to be similar to an R72 or 89B. It looks opaque to a casual glance, but if you hold it up to your eye you can see a dim red image through it, and the images I got seem basically like those I've taken in the past with an R72. I don't know how to determine the age of the filter; there's no visible serial number. The rim says "Franke & Heidecke - Germany - Rollei-Infrarot - 28,5°" (that's a lower case phi at the end)".

    I set up a measuring tape and took four exposures, one unfiltered and three with the filter on: (1) at the same point of focus, (2) focused about three inches closer, (3) focused about three inches further. I don't remember what the exposures were, but I metered at EI 100 with no filter and EI 6 with the filter and the density of the negatives suggests that this was about right. (I had evening sun, which is relatively high in IR relative to visible wavelengths.) The results are attached; these are actual-pixel crops from negative scans. They aren't an ideal reference for critical comparisons, but all we need to do here is recognize the point of focus in each image.

    The unfiltered exposure shows that I missed my focus slightly; I was aiming for the red 16 mark but ended up closer to the 17. I blame my eye and the dim screen rather than camera adjustment.

    Image 2, with no change in focus, is basically identically focused, suggesting that the optical compensation is there and correct. Similarly, image 3, where I focused visually at about 13, is focused on the 13, and image 4 is around 20 or 21 rather than the 19 I was aiming for (probably just meaning I missed again).

    Conclusions: (1) Rolleicords are kind of hard to focus, (2) my eyes are old, and (3) no focus compensation is required with this filter when using the Efke film.

    It's possible that even with an uncompensated filter I wouldn't need to make an adjustment with this near-IR film. To be fair, I should run the same test with a conventional IR filter, but I got distracted and took some pictures of plants instead. They weren't very good but they were focused correctly.

    -NT
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails infrarot-1-unfiltered.jpg   infrarot-2-no-adjustment.jpg   infrarot-3-front-focus.jpg   infrarot-4-back-focus.jpg  
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    277
    I have one of these. I also use a Rolleicord. It's very good for IR work as you don't need to remove the filter to focus/compose. I had heard (here I think) about the optical correction, but have never seen anything official to confirm it. I don't make focus adjustments, but get good results with the Rollei IR film. That may be down to the subjects I choose, DoF and luck. I get the impression this filter is a bit less than 720nm. Possibly 695? Again, although it is mentioned in my references, there is very little info on its actual specification. I like it because it works, and you can use the lens shade with it. It was quite expensive. I picked mine up NOS from a store.
    Alex.

  3. #3
    piu58's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Leipzig, Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    595
    > Rollei-Infrarot - 28,5°" (that's a lower case phi at the end

    The ° is a sign for diameter here in Germany.
    ~
    I shot quite al lot of IR with the Agfa aerial films with a 720nm filter. In the beginning I testet whether a focus compesation would be necessary. It isn't; at least not for lenses of the Gauss/Planar type.
    ---
    Uwe Pilz

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    San Diego, CA, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,274
    Images
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by piu58 View Post
    The ° is a sign for diameter here in Germany.
    I always assumed it stood for Philter...

    I shot quite al lot of IR with the Agfa aerial films with a 720nm filter. In the beginning I testet whether a focus compesation would be necessary. It isn't; at least not for lenses of the Gauss/Planar type.
    Oh, I hadn't thought of the effect of lens design, but now that you mention it I see it would matter. Something else to test when I have a chance---the only Bay I camera I have is the 'cord, but I could compare a number of lenses using a standard uncompensated filter.

    In any case, I'm glad to have it for the sake of completeness, and I found it at a somewhat reasonable price. I think the Bay I versions are cheaper than the rarer II or the larger III.

    -NT
    Nathan Tenny
    San Diego, CA, USA

    The lady of the house has to be a pretty swell sort of person to put up with the annoyance of a photographer.
    -The Little Technical Library, _Developing, Printing, And Enlarging_

  5. #5
    StoneNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    7,312
    Images
    225
    It's my understanding that the weaker 720nm (I can't make the proper symbols) isn't far enough into the IR spectrum to need any adjustment, and that only in the 800+ arena do you need to worry about focus shift, and since they don't make 800+ film anymore, I wouldn't worry about it.
    ~Stone | "...of course, that's just my opinion. I could be wrong." ~Dennis Miller



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin