Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,537   Posts: 1,544,268   Online: 778
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    mikewhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    9
    Why don't you put it up on eBay as a Special Edition Soft Focus SL66 that has been known to have the image of the Virgin Mary show up in negatives that include large amounts of blank sky.

    Other things to check....

    What aperture do you shoot at? Try taking the same picture at different f-stops and comparing to see if there isn't something revealed by that. Perhaps they will be sharp at some apertures but not others. Are you using a 220 or 120 back and does the film match the back (e.g. are you putting 120 film into a 220 back)? Was theu tester-guy's laster our of alignment<g>? Are you wearing galsses when you look at the prints?

    -Mike

  2. #12
    rbarker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Rio Rancho, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,222
    Images
    2
    One more thought, Leon. You might also check the film path, rollers in particular. There might be something stuck to a roller that is causing the film to buckle behind the gate.
    [COLOR=SlateGray]"You can't depend on your eyes if your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain[/COLOR]

    Ralph Barker
    Rio Rancho, NM

  3. #13
    Leon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Kent, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,075
    thanks for all the suggestions guys

    The enlarger is fine - good solid double glass carrier with spirit level checks of baseboard, carrier and lens plane before each session. Old negatives are giving me good sharp prints

    mikewhi ... sl66 backs are adaptable between 120 and 220 at the flick of a switch -i cant use 120 at the 220 setting, so I dont think thats it.

    Ralph - The film holders look fine ... I'm getting the problem using both of my two backs so unless they both have the same alignment issues ....?

    I'm reliably informed that both the focusing screen and film plane alignments have been checked with no faults showing ... so???


    what a nightmare!

  4. #14
    David H. Bebbington's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    East Kent, United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,364
    Images
    36
    Leon, could I ask you - with how many lenses is this problem happening? Have you previously had good results with these? If a fine-quality lens delivers duff performance but looks OK, this usually points to its having had a generous thumping, leading to misalignment.

    I once had an f3.5 50 mm Leitz Elmar, made just after the war, which looked totally mint. I even spent money having a small scratch polished out and looked forward to using a perfect specimen of a legendary lens. The results was very poor, I sent it to several expert repairmen for a collimation check, it turned out the lens had been a dog since the day it was made! Probably an inaccuracy in the basic grinding of the elements, which you really wouldn't expect of Leitz (or Zeiss!).

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,097
    Could the Focusing screen be installed upside down?

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    I believe these questions may have been addressed previously, but:

    Do the images remain unsharp when you change lenses?

    Is there any indication of a loose element or de-bonded/separated element in your lens?

    Have you checked the image sharpness at the focal plane with a ground glass and magnifier? Then compared this with the image on your focusing screen?
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  7. #17
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,846
    Blog Entries
    1
    I had a similar problem which Oceanside Camera Repair (now out of business because of old age), traced to some bushing to do with the focusing track. He replaced it, and no futher problems. As I remember, he told me this is not uncommon, but can not be diagnosed without dismantling the camera.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin