Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,225   Posts: 1,532,668   Online: 804
      
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Max Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Aylmer, QC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    598
    Images
    5

    Anyone have experience with ARAX (Kiev)?

    Hey all!

    I'm starting to get more and more interested in MF. My darkroom is fully equipped to exploit MF and I recently bought a very inexpensive C220 to test the waters. The C220 takes amazing photographs, but I just cannot seem to get into the whole TLR vibe. I'm used to the RF/SLR 'way of life' with my
    Canonet and X-700; and I really am used to the WYSIWYG from an SLR.

    I am an amateur, not a pro, so I honestly cannot justify shelling out a bazillion dollars on a Hassy, and the glass is really expensive. Truth of the matter is that I doubt that I could exploit a Hassy to it's potential anyway!

    I have been searching around and have come across ARAX which is a company, much like KievUSA, which takes Kievs from the factory and reworks them into acceptable machines and sends them out with a money-back guarantee and a 1 year warranty.

    I'm maybe thinking about an ARAX (Kiev) 60 in about a year or so. Does anyone here on APUG have any first or second-hand experience with ARAX?

    Cheers,
    Kent
    Max Power, he's the man who's name you'd love to touch! But you mustn't touch! His name sounds good in your ear, but when you say it, you mustn't fear! 'Cause his name can be said by anyone!

  2. #2
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4
    May,

    I´m using a Kiev 88 Six I bought from Richard Wiese in Hamburg - inside in it´s guts it´s probably modified by Hartblei. Mine has P6 mount, MLU, cloth shutter and the body works flawless since I bought it new in 1998 (the backs need service on a regular schedule, thats it).

    "I am an amateur, not a pro, so I honestly cannot justify shelling out a bazillion dollars on a Hassy, and the glass is really expensive."

    Yep. Old beaten up Hassi bodies are cheap and plenty - but they are 40years old and the glass price will kill ya.

    The Kiev glass is decent and affordable, as is the Carl Zeiss Jena stuff - I own a few rather special lenses, the 30mm Zodiak just for fun, the 55mm PCS as "bread and butter" wide angle, the 2,8/180 Sonnar to scare the looters away. ;-)

    "I have been searching around and have come across ARAX which is a company, much like KievUSA, which takes Kievs from the factory and reworks them into acceptable machines and sends them out with a money-back guarantee and a 1 year warranty."

    It depends. The Arax SE kits are not "taken from the factory" - they are used cameras, bought in flea markets etc and reworked. Those can be 20 years old and you never know - Vartanyan grinds old the Kiev serial numbers and replaces them with "Arax SN".

    The 88CM are indeed new cameras - which you actually can buy identically from the factory.

    "I'm maybe thinking about an ARAX (Kiev) 60 in about a year or so. "

    Hehe. A K60 would have been my recommendation for a Kiev newbie - they are cheap, more simple (no backs, which can be trouble), functional. And both big and ugly. ,)

    "Does anyone here on APUG have any first or second-hand experience with ARAX?"

    I know a handful of Arax-Kiev users. Most are satisfied, just one had trouble with his second 88 body - he bought it, left for holidays while trusting the warranty ("we check any back before shipping"). And he came back with a handful of rolls, exposed by a lightleak - he should have run a roll prior to the trip. .-(

    The others are happy users - mechanically they are as sound as a Kiev can get. But please, don´t fall for the SE kits - the leather will wear out, looking horrible, the "black chrome" is just a layer of paint upon the factory chrome rims.

    "Cheers,
    Kent"
    Tschüss,
    Roman

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Milwaukee, Wi
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    3,242
    if your interests are to photograph with the use of a tripod I beleive that there is a device available for the Mamiya TLR called a Paramender. This device allows one to focus conventionally with the top lens and then to move the taking lens into the position of the viewing lens and to remove parralax fron the photo taking process. It does not allow for depth of field preview.

    I have never used one of the Mamiya TLRs. I do own though an RZ67. My main disappointment with the RZ67 is the PITA in using the depth of field scales. The camera has very nice depth of field preview but when the light is of very low contrast I would welcome a more user friendly depth of field scale.

    I am to unfamilar with the Mamiya press cameras to talk with authority about them but I believe that they have a ground glass back available. If that is correct and since you like rangefinder cameras this could be an option worthy of investigation. Of course you could also look at the Koni-Omega cameras. I do not believe that they offer groundglass viewing but I could easily be wrong. The Linhof Technika roll film cameras do offer both rangefinder as well as groundglass viewing but you may be getting to closer to Hasselblad prices. They are without about, for a person that uses a tripod, the most flexible of the lot offering both lens movements and a back adjustment. The Horseman press is also similarly flexible.

    Good luck with your search.

  4. #4
    Mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    960
    I considered Arax and found lots of people who were happy with them, but when I found I could get a bargain condition Mamiya RB67-ProS from KEH for under $400 I decided to go with something I knew would stand up to actual use.

    The biggest problem with Arax is that they're starting with products from the Arsenal factory, so even if they "get it right" before they ship it to you, there's a chance something will break and you'll end up sending it back. Postage for me from the US to Arax would have quickly added up to more than the system cost. The RB67, on the other hand, is likely to work for longer than I live.

    Since the pro's have dumped MF equipment onto the market at such a high rate over the last few years, there's little reason to consider entering the crap-shoot involved in ex-Soviet products. The prices just aren't justified when you can get high quality equipment for a song.
    Film is cheap. Opportunities are priceless.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,234
    Images
    9
    Go to www.kievaholic.com it is a very informative kiev site. It also has a link to the Kiev report near the bottom of the home page. The kiev report is a forum dedicated to russian cameras and has a lot about ARAX. Everything you wanted to know about russian cameras and more. The nicest bunch of folks on the net too. There are members from there are here as well and maybe they have first hand experience with ARAX. My experience is only second hand.

    ARAX is a good friendly company to work with, but their cameras are still Kievs, so many are born with defects. What I like about arax is, if your camera is a dud, you send it back to them and they adjust that camera. Other places just swap the camera out for another so you might get a whole new set of problems. Kiev USA is a rip off.

    I got lucky with my Kiev. It has shown no signs of any problems. That said, of the Kiev cameras, the 60 might be ugly but it is the least prone to problems. Plus you have access to the P6 style lenses which include some really nice pieces of very affordable glass.

    The glass is the reason to get a Kiev, there is a lot of great lenses and it is all very, very affordable.

    This was taken with my (real)Hartblei master 88 and Mir 45mm lens. The actual transparency is much sharper than my scanning abilities.

    (I can't get a thumb nail to attach so I'll post it in the standard gallery)
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,234
    Images
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by Mongo
    Since the pro's have dumped MF equipment onto the market at such a high rate over the last few years, there's little reason to consider entering the crap-shoot involved in ex-Soviet products. The prices just aren't justified when you can get high quality equipment for a song.
    The problem is the lenses are not falling in prices as fast as the bodies
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  7. #7
    Mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by mark
    The problem is the lenses are not falling in prices as fast as the bodies
    I'd disagree...lens prices, at least for the RB system, have plummeted dramatically over the last year. (The same can't be said for Hasselblad...those lenses never seem to get cheaper.) For the RB, 180mm lenses in KEH bargain condition are under $200...actually cheaper than a 150mm from Arax. In general long lens prices are about equivalent between Arax for Kiev lenses and KEH bargain for Mamiay RB lenses. Wide angles are still cheaper at Arax, but Mamiya 50mm lenses are under $350 and falling fast. Although they may still cost more than the Kiev lenses, you are getting Mamiya's build quality. Within a few more months, I expect that an RB system with lenses will actually be cheaper than an equivalent Arax system (unless Arax drops their prices).
    Film is cheap. Opportunities are priceless.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    5,234
    Images
    9
    You're comparing new to used lenses. I can see comparing a new kiev type body to a used body from another manufacturer but not the lenses. Those you have to compare new to new and used to used.
    Technological society has succeeded in multiplying the opportunities for pleasure, but it has great difficulty in generating joy. Pope Paul VI

    So, I think the "greats" were true to their visions, once their visions no longer sucked. Ralph Barker 12/2004

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    I bought a Kiev 6C and a 250mm lens from Arax. All good. But in todays market you can get Pentax or Mamiya 645, Bronica 6x6,Mamiya 6x7 all for similar amounts of money. They all have features that are worth something. With the 645s you can stick the Kiev lenses on the front with a relatively cheap adapter.

    The main advantage of the Kievs is the multitude of lenses. Price a fisheye for any other MF system. I'm going to agree with some of the comments that MF lenses have dropped in prices but they still aren't in Kiev price areas. Nor are they common like the Kievs.

    On reliability my broken MF is my Pentax. My Kievs are just fine.

    I don't know. I personally would be hard pressed to reccomend investing in a Kiev system right now unless you're a lens addict. It's great that I own a 45mm,65mm,80mm,90mm,150mm and a 250mm. Not to mention I intend to add a 30mm. But do I really need all those?

    BTW I find using the waist level finder with all that implies the best way to use the Kiev 60 or 6C.

  10. #10
    Max Power's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Aylmer, QC
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    598
    Images
    5
    Thanks everyone for your input!

    I've also been cruising the Kiev Report. The consensus seems to be that with the K60 there are 3 common issues and that if they are adjusted/repaired right off the bat by ARAX or KievCamera or KievUSA then you will be good for years. The other thing is that repairs and adjustments, outside of the 1-year warranty are very inexpensive.

    I'm going to have to give this more thought...Thanks again everyone!

    Kent
    Max Power, he's the man who's name you'd love to touch! But you mustn't touch! His name sounds good in your ear, but when you say it, you mustn't fear! 'Cause his name can be said by anyone!

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin