Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,982   Posts: 1,523,847   Online: 1007
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,816
    Images
    29

    Bronica SQB or SQA

    Recently I was lent a Bronica SQB kit for evaluating with a possible purchase being the end result, from a friend.

    I like the camera and the price is probably going to be very competitive, however, after doing a bit of research it appears that the SQA may be a better body in the long run.

    Then to make matters interesting I have just found a brand new SQB kit for a really, really good price, with full warranty, for what that is worth.

    I have had very little exposure to Bronica, but have a bit of use and experience with RB & RZ's and Hasselblad.

    My question is really about whether the SQB is liveable compared to an SQA?

    I searched the forums for as much information about the two bodies but couldn't really get an understanding of the short comings of the SQB or the better points (supposedly) of the SQA.

    Any thoughts would be welcome.

    Mick.

  2. #2
    mikewhi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Redmond, WA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    808
    Images
    9
    I went with a SQB because I did not need any electronics. I do B&W and I use a hand held meter only. I wanted as close to a mechanical camera as possible. Plus, the SQB is a lot cheaper than the SQA. The B will use the same lenses.

    If you need metering and electronics, then go for the SQA. If I shot a lot of color, I would use the SQA over the SQB. The SQB was intended as an entry-level simple camera and the SQA is more feature laden. I don't recall all the differences, but I'm sure that info is readily available on the web.

    I do like the SQB a lot and it fills the bill for me just fine (or it did until I finally got a SL66 outfit, which is even better).

    -Mike

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Italia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,680
    In today's used market buy the SQ-AI. Not the A or the B. Do you need the added features? Maybe not but it'll be newer. That alone makes the small increase in cost worth it. Plus you may want the added features.

  4. #4
    dschneller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Credit, ON Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    317
    Images
    34
    SQ-Ai:
    You may add on a motor drive, the SQ-i motor.
    There is a connection port for off-the-film plane flash control.
    The body has a multi exposure warning in the viewfinder
    A 16 second calibrated shutter speed
    "B" (bulb) setting on the shutter speed dial.
    The backs between the previous models and the SQAi are fully compatible
    All accessories for the SQ, SQ-A, and SQ-Am were compatible with this body.


    SQ-A:
    Is an updated SQ.
    Auto metering capability with the AE finder S.
    Mirror lock-up lever was added.
    All accessories for SQ cameras fit the SQ-A.


    SQ-B:
    Is almost the same as the SQ-A, no metered prism.
    The shutter speed range is the same as the SQ-A (8 sec to 1/500).
    The SQ-B has mirror lock-up.


    SQ:
    This is the one I have and is the precursor to the models above. No metering, no mirror lock-up, same shutter speed range as the SQ-A, SQ-B.

    I'm really happy with my SQ, I don't miss the in camera metering since I use a spot or reflective meter.

    Dave
    "...slow down and start using photography to create an image, not just capture one." b.e.wilson

    "Speed kills, Del" Johnny Fever

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    48
    For my original Bronica purchase, it was the mirror lock-up function that swung me to the SQA. I have since also purchased an SQAi body for no other reason than it was attached to a PS lens I wanted to buy. I now find I mostly use the SQAi, I have come to enjoy the convenience of Bulb and 16sec exposure settings at my finger tips also.
    The SQAi also came with a AE prism that I normally never use but was very glad I had it when my handheld meter died on a recent trip to Berlin.
    I guess it comes down to the warranty instead of the features, as I imagine a used SQAi kit is comparable to a new SQB. So how long is the warranty and how important is it to you?

  6. #6
    bobfowler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, Land of the Living Dead
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,440
    Images
    19
    Dave missed a model, the SQ-AM - a motorized version of the SQ-A.

    FWIW, I have both the SQ-Ai and SQ-A bodies. The SQ-Ai offers some additional features, but it does so at the price of decreased battery life.

    One trick worth knowing - The SQ-A uses a PX-28 battery, the SQ-Ai uses 4 - A76 cells. Since I carry both body types, I only buy the PX-28 batteries. When it's time for new batteries in the SQ-Ai, I dissect a PX-28 to get the 4 A76 cells inside. I also carry an extra battery holder for the SQ-Ai and an extra battery door for the SQ-A, both are easy items to lose...

    Almost forgot... If you get the SQ-Ai and the motor drive (if you call .8 FPS a "motor drive"), you can forget about having to replace camera batteries as the body is powered by the AA cells in the motor. A motor is on my "must buy soon" list...
    Bob Fowler
    fowler@verizon.net
    Some people are like Slinkies. They're really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.

  7. #7
    Baxter Bradford's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Lymington, South Coast, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    772
    Images
    102
    Some good advice given. Seems to depend on how you are going to meter and if a metering prism is in your plans. I have an SQA and use none of the attributes it has over an SQB. For 8s or over, I use double exposure facility since it is a fiddle to use the lens fitting.

    Which leads me on to lens type. You should opt for PS lenses, not the S lenses.

    The PS lenses have half stops, the original ones only have full stops which is not really sufficient if using Transparency film. I think that they are also supposed to be sharper, but haven't tested this. The PS have a plunger to disengage to get the B setting on the shutter which is easier than the device they have on the older lenses.

    They are nice cameras, I rarely use mine at present, but am always pleased with the handling and results. It seems too easy to use compared with my usual 5x4, so I'm always thinking that there must be something I have forgotten!

  8. #8
    bobfowler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    New Jersey, Land of the Living Dead
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,440
    Images
    19
    I've been using my Bronica's a lot more than my 35mm gear (or my large format stuff) lately. They handle so well, I almost hate to use my F3!
    Bob Fowler
    fowler@verizon.net
    Some people are like Slinkies. They're really good for nothing, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down a flight of stairs.

  9. #9
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,816
    Images
    29
    Well the information here has been exceptionally good. I now know the major differences between the models and I think that the basic model would be alright but the SQA or SQAi may be more of what I'm after.

    I meter using a hand held, even with my F3 bodies, so that isn't an issue. I'm a heavy tripod user, so no change, but the size of the negs and the clarity is quite astounding. I cannot see lens being an issue, apart from price.

    I didn't know about the ½ stop indentation as the SQB I've been using has ½ stop indents. The battery issue with the SQAi is an interesting one and I think the remedy is quite ingenious.

    I think I'll look for an SQAi instead.

    For what it's worth for anyone in Australia, The Camera Exchange in Melbourne has a brand new SQB kit complete, brand new, unopened and is for sale with full warranty for $1,400 including tax. That's a back, WLF, 80mm lens and body. It only went on the market this week after a decision by the management to move some medium format stuff.

    As I now don't wish to purchase it someone else may. I think that is a really competitive price, even allowing the fact that the models are no longer being manufactured.

    Many thanks for the really good input.

    Mick.

  10. #10
    dschneller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Port Credit, ON Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    317
    Images
    34
    $1,400 seems a bit steep to me. I put together my SQ, WLF, 80mm, and 2-120 backs for a lot less than that (in CAD).

    Dave
    "...slow down and start using photography to create an image, not just capture one." b.e.wilson

    "Speed kills, Del" Johnny Fever

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin