Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,960   Posts: 1,558,284   Online: 954
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    970
    Images
    3

    Damaged element but still works!

    Hello All,

    I recently took a chance and bought an "AS IS" Zeiss Distagon 50mm f 4 lens for the Rolleiflex SL66 at KEH. The lens was described as having a damaged element and the price was around $100 so I bought it. Rollei SL66 lenses are hard to come by, especially the wide angles.

    I received it yesterday and the second element (the lens has 7 elements) from the front has a 1/4" bubble at the edge. Not even covering the aperture. I don't know how it got there the lens case looks perfect.

    Anyway, I ran a roll of film through it of the rear of my house ranging from full f4 to f22. On the light table with the 10X loupe, I see a slight blurr bottom right edge at F4 and it seems to go away at f5.6 and through f22.

    Any other tests I can do and do I have a good user lens here?

    I am just happy to finally have another lens other than the 80mm...

    Thanks for your advice,
    John

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,364
    Images
    20
    Yeah, there are some great deals like that to be had. Mine was a Canon FD 400/4.5 SSC that was mechanically perfect with case and four drop-in filters, but it had a serious fungus infestation. $125 for the lens plus $80 for a cleaning, and it's got some etching on the glass, but it's still takes darn good pictures.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3
    Jeremy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,767
    Images
    56
    Always been a fan of KEH.
    Let's see what I've got in the magic trash can for Mateo!

    blog
    website

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,670
    Quote Originally Posted by JHannon
    Anyway, I ran a roll of film through it of the rear of my house ranging from full f4 to f22. On the light table with the 10X loupe, I see a slight blurr bottom right edge at F4 and it seems to go away at f5.6 and through f22.
    One of the laws of optics states the all portions of a lens image all portions of an image. Therefore, if you were to see any effect of the bubble it would be that of an overall degradation of the image and not in specific portion.

    Years ago when it was difficult to produce large amounts of optical glass it was perfectly permissible to sell lenses with a bubble or two.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    970
    Images
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerald Koch
    One of the laws of optics states the all portions of a lens image all portions of an image. Therefore, if you were to see any effect of the bubble it would be that of an overall degradation of the image and not in specific portion.

    Years ago when it was difficult to produce large amounts of optical glass it was perfectly permissible to sell lenses with a bubble or two.
    Thanks for your response. This seems more like impact damage than a bubble in the glass. The lens case shows no sign of dents, etc. Stopped down, I see no distortion but at full aperture I see a blurr lower right corner.

    I just did not know how a wide lens reacts to this type of problem. I guess I will just use it and see how it goes.

    Thanks,
    John

  6. #6
    Mongo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    960
    Quote Originally Posted by JHannon
    Any other tests I can do and do I have a good user lens here?
    I think you've done all of the testing that you need to do John. Shoot with the lens at f/5.6 or smaller and you'll probably be fine. You might want, when the opportunity presents itself, to try some shots with a bright light source to see if you get more flare or not. It's hard to predict these things (especially without actually handling the lens), but my guess is you got the best deal you're ever going to get on a Rollei lens. Congratulations!

    (By the way, I have a process lens that I use for LF...it's got edge separation the whole way around the front element that impinges onto the image when the lens is wide open (f/8). Stopping down to f/11, I've never seen any effect at all from the separation, even with the sun near the corner of the image. I'd think a front lens problem would be likelier to cause a problem than a 2nd lens imperfection.)

    Be well.
    Dave
    Film is cheap. Opportunities are priceless.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin