Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,867   Posts: 1,583,242   Online: 1104
      
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    joeyk49's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,325
    Images
    26

    Konica 160 disappointment

    I grabbed a fist full of Konica 160 in 220 about 8 or 9 months ago. I've run about four to six rolls through my 124G and I can tell you that the results have been less than encouraging....

    Compared to the Fuji NPH 400, the images are more muted and a little less sharp.

    Has anyone else experienced this? With the cost of developing 120, I'm a little miffed...or am I spoiled by Fuji? I may have been mistaken, but I thought that Konica was an okay brand...?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,416
    Konica 160PS is a portrait film with contrast and saturation on the lower side, if that's what you meant by "muted." I didn't use it myself, but I used to use Kodak VPS, Fujifilm NPS and then Pro 160... I'm very happy with Pro 160/400/800 series.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin