Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,949   Posts: 1,585,937   Online: 995
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,934

    Mamiya RB67 140macro lense

    I was thinking about getting the 140macro lense. Is it a decent lense? I already have a 50 and the 180.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    The Cape
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,930
    is that a soft focus lens....or is it a soft focus lens for the M645?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,934
    I don't believe it is soft focus. I was hoping to find some info on the 140macro for the RB67.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NY
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    20
    This Mamiya lens has a link, try it for info.

    http://www.mamiya.com/products/defau...=51&ID2=81&Z=4
    Patrick

  5. #5
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    I don't have the 140, so keep that in mind as you read my comment...

    I think just about all the rb lenses (I have the 37, the 65, 127, 150, 180, and 360) are nice for macro; I have a couple of different extension tubes and I have been very happy with them. I don't see any really offensive distortion at close focus with any of them, well, excluding the fish I didn't get the 140 macro because the neighbouring focal lengths are so nice and you can achieve similar reproduction ratios with tubes. And they have the same f/32 minimum aperture, as I recall.

    On the other hand, the rb lenses are so inexpensive now, why not pick up a truckload while you can...
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,934
    Thanks for the information. Jeff Kubach

  7. #7
    Travis Nunn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Henrico, Virginia USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,604
    Images
    32
    Even with the 140mm, I believe you'll still need extension tubes to get 1:1.
    ____________________________________________
    Searching my way to perplexion

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Dedham, Ma, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format Pan
    Posts
    625
    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Kubach View Post
    I was thinking about getting the 140macro lense. Is it a decent lense? I already have a 50 and the 180.
    It's a decent lens that also doubles as a portrait lens. The 90 is faster, fits niecly between 50 and 180, and will magnify more - also incorporates a floating element design for close work.
    "Pictures are not incidental frills to a text; they are essences of our distinctive way of knowing." Stephen J. Gould

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    3,563
    My 90mm is a triplet and does not have a floating lens, the 140 is 'symmetrical' and does have a floating element. If you need optimium performance e.g. copying small objects at high resolution then I'd suggest you have to pay the piper, and get a 140mm, and set it for the magnification you are using. If you only need snaps then the 90 or 127 will do ok.
    Do you make posters out of shots of spiders or other insects?
    Noel
    Last edited by Xmas; 10-14-2007 at 06:57 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    26
    Hi,

    The 140 macro is my favourite lens for the RB. I use it for macro of course but also for portraits. Because of the floating element one get impeccable performance at any distance. I did sell my 127 though when I got the 140. Just too close.

    Best regards,

    Michiel Fokkema



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin