6x6 with movements?

[arigram]

I definitely would prefer 6x6 - it is the format that I am most happy with.
I really don't want to get a 4x5 - I'd prefer something more compact.

I only know of the Hasselblad FlexBody that fits that description.

[Q.G.]

Better still: the Hasselblad ArcBody.

The FlexBody is very limited - by the Zeiss lenses it takes - in what it can do.
The ArcBody uses Rodenstock lenses with sufficient covering power to make good use of movements.

But though small, these thingies are also rather expensive.

[vdonovan]

What about this baby:http://www.dannyburk.com/fuji_gx680iii.htm

[epatsellis]

I am somewhat biased, but this would work and can be done quite inexpensively:

Far more flexibility than anything VH has put out, ever, and you can use a graflex 6x6 back (RH12) if you wish.

erie

[rob champagne]

http://www.fujifilm.co.uk/profession..._02_gx680.html

bigger and heavier(quite a bit) than a hasselblad or SL66 but a good camera with a wide range of lenses.

Its not made anymore but there's lots of used kit on the market.

[rob champagne]

And then there is the Linhof M679 which will take hasselblad film backs and mamiya film backs, most digital backs. Takes most largeformat lenses also.
Really designed as a studio camera for digi backs but works just as well with film. But it is a view camera albeit smaller than 4x5 although probably as heavy or heavier than a lightweight 4x5 field camera.

http://www.linhof.de/english/index.html

[mark]

I really liked my Galvin when I used it. Very light, very usable. PM me if you are interested in buying one. I just don't use it, and it should be used. I got two 6x9 backs too.