If joy and excitement is what you're looking for then my advice is that you should get a camera that is the least similar to your current one. Most of 6x4.5 cameras with prism finders are like oversized 35mm SLRs. For more thrills try for example something with waist level finer or square film format.
Russian cameras (same goes to Ukrainian and ones from GDR) are cheap and fun, also the lenses are just wicked (I still get slimy grin on my face when I think about my old Volna 80/2.8) but their unreliability kills everything.
Mamiyas, Bronicas, Hassies and all the rest that came from the bowels of capitalistic photographic industry are good cameras altogether. Remember that they ware made for professional market to meet high quality standards. If you get one in a good shape it should make a great sidekick for you.
On the other hand I have to mention my recent camera purchase, which is old russian folder: the Iskra. For the cost of lens exchangeability and risk of buying a worn out rubbish you get a fabulous piece equipment with this irreplaceable Leica-like feeling of distinction and substantiality. In addition to that I just adore the way this thing smells. Since you are often holding your camera close to your nose IMHO it is important not to neglect that sense as well.
FWIW, there are adapters for the Pentacon/Kiev-6 lenses to mount them on at least some other popular MF cameras. I don't have experience with these adapters, though, so I'm not sure how good they are. In principle, though, they could help one build a low-cost lens collection around a more reliable camera.
Originally Posted by Michal Kolosowski
"Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti
Indeed. I have just started with a Mamiya 645J and use my Pentacon lenses on it in full manual mode. The results are just as good as I was hoping for.
Originally Posted by srs5694
thank you so much everybody for your valuable replies!
I have been just doing that Hans, but the more I look the bigger gets the choice. Now foldable cameras just got added to my list!
Originally Posted by clogz
There is no hurry and I certainly will try to get my hands an various cameras to see how they feel before I decide.
Just 3 days ago I was able to handle a Pentax 645 and I was amazed at the bright viewfinder and the ease to manually focus.
Originally Posted by frdrx
would not foldable cameras, rangefinders be another choice?
Originally Posted by Ian Grant
A foldable camera would be that much more portable. - But then that would be fixed lens, is it? And how about focusing foldable cameras...must be difficult?
Most of all because of manual focusing I am leaning towards SLR. Is my reasoning correct?
for some ( me? ) the Kiev could have a good fun factor. I really must get my hand on various cams to decide!
Originally Posted by nworth
this sounds like a very good advice, thank's arigram. I do the same when choosing ther cameras, and so it should be when choosing a medium format camera. maybe even more so, since the differences are even more pronounced.
Originally Posted by arigram
have never looked into Mamiyas nor the mentioned Yashica yet.
Originally Posted by jbannow
time to study up....
thank you for all your good replies,
may come back for more questions,
kuuan \ Andreas
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
The Kiev is not reliable? Well, I have a Kiev 88 with the standard metal focal plane shutter and the Pentacon 6 bayonet lens mount. It was made in 1990, but I have had it only a few months. I did need to work on some known light leaks, but it has worked so far. I am still enjoying it at this time. I also considered an early Bronica because of their Zenzanon lenses, but decided to go for the adventure of the Kiev 88 instead. So far it has been fun, and I keep thinking of how much more expensive even a Hassy 500C would have been. And there is the enjoyment you get when another accomplished photographer realizes what you are carrying, and the look they get on their face. Priceless!
Now I am looking at the Nikon CoolScan 9000 as a way of getting around the need for a darkroom. I will have more in the film scanner than in the entire Kiev with lenses and accessories.
Enjoy; Ralph Javins
I prefer leaf shutter lenses because they flash sync at every speed. The Bronica ETRSi is excellent, and prices are reasonable. I'd skip 67 SLRs for your first camera - they are large and heavy beasts that generally belong on tripods.
"- first of all gives me much joy..."
That is covered by most cameras of any format!
"- does not cost much used ( MF )"
Look at non-Rollei TLRs (6x6), 645s, Bronica SQs (6x6), or Mamiya RB67s (6x7). Possibly Pentax 67, but they are not always cheap from what I have seen. (Sometimes they are and sometimes they aren't)
"- can get a big range of very good but inexpensive lenses for it"
I would say your best bet here is Mamiya or Pentax 645s. Mamiya TLRs are cheap, but there are only seven FLs, none of which is particularly long or particularly short.
"- is rather light and small"
That gets rid of the Mamiya RB67, Pentax 67, and Mamiya TLR. Some of the most recent Mamiya TLRs are lighter than the earlier ones, but they still are not very small.
I would say a Mamiya M645 Pro, personally, if I was going to suggest a first medium format camera. Lenses are very cheap, they are very easy to operate...don't feel much different than a 35mm SLR...and they have interchangeable magazines. I have two earlier ones that do not have the interchangeable magazines, and I find myself wishing they did. Another great advantage is the lens compatibility that spans over 30 years. It is not an orphaned/dead system like some great medium format buys...it has just slowly morphed into what it is today. The old lenses will go right onto a brand new digital-equipped body. And the company is still alive and well in the medium format world, so parts and service are a breeze.
If it wasn't for that darned "rather small and light" requirement, I would suggest Mamiya RB67 in a heartbeat. With what they are going for now, I feel like picking up a gross of them.
My first medium format camera was a Mamiya Super 23. Great camera, but not the easiest thing in the world to find parts and support for!
Last edited by 2F/2F; 07-04-2008 at 07:19 AM. Click to view previous post history.
"Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."
- Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)
I've just recently gotten into MF (early this year), the first one I was a Rolleiflex 3.5F which I really like and I think it was that which made me decided to do more with medium format, after the I bought a Mamiya 7ii which is a really great camera and can't really fault it.
Hope this helps.