Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,981 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 322 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
637 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Medium Format Cameras and Accessories > How slow can you go handholding a TLR?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-12-2008, 03:48 AM   #21 (permalink)
 
Sino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chania, Greece
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark_S View Post
At the other end of the spectrum, when in a crowd and I hold the TLR upside down above my head, I am going to need a faster shutter speed.
Now that's a funny picture -- walking in a crowd, holding a TLR upside down and pondering over which shutter speed to use. Last night people thought I was crazy because I was just kneeling to take a picture of a very symmetrical fence.

AW, when I use my Yashica-A, I go as low as 1/25 -- and that's as low as the camera goes anyway

-Sino.
__________________
Close your eyes to see. This will take a while.
Sino is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 09:49 AM   #22 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 157
Default

The answers to your original question is: "It varies" , but some people are better than others. A long time ago I read an article on this in a swedish photomagazine. They had a platoon of young militaries shoot a roll of film on a fixed target with a 200mm lens on it. Then they compared the results with their shooting range results. These results matched each other very well. The best shots had the best (sharpest) pictures.
Also, while not in any sense being a marksman, applying similar tactics will get you a long way. I.e. keep to the ground, find support like walls, trees etc. A monopod will reduce camera-motion blur a lot. (It will probably be in only one direction instead of erratic.)
At last, quite a few shots have been expelled from competitions for having a beer or a glass of wine before shooting sessions. Noone have ever seen these guys in the same situation drinking a lot of coffee, as already noted. So, let's all go the pub for a beer and a game of darts.

//Björn
edtbjon is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 09:55 AM   #23 (permalink)
 
2F/2F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 947
Default

You can go quite slower than you might think. '30 definitely with an 80mm. '15 probably most of the time. Slower if you are really careful and don't mind taking a shot on a gamble.

One great thing about square format is how convenient a monopod is. Of course, it hits you in the nuts sometimes, but much easier to use than with a rectangle.
__________________
2F/2F
2F/2F is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 11:11 AM   #24 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 838
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edtbjon View Post
The answers to your original question is: "It varies" , but some people are better than others. A long time ago I read an article on this in a swedish photomagazine. They had a platoon of young militaries shoot a roll of film on a fixed target with a 200mm lens on it. Then they compared the results with their shooting range results. These results matched each other very well. The best shots had the best (sharpest) pictures.
Also, while not in any sense being a marksman, applying similar tactics will get you a long way. I.e. keep to the ground, find support like walls, trees etc. A monopod will reduce camera-motion blur a lot. (It will probably be in only one direction instead of erratic.)
At last, quite a few shots have been expelled from competitions for having a beer or a glass of wine before shooting sessions. Noone have ever seen these guys in the same situation drinking a lot of coffee, as already noted. So, let's all go the pub for a beer and a game of darts.

//Björn
Perhaps target shooting with a camera can become an Olympic sport ;-)
dpurdy is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 11:35 AM   #25 (permalink)
 
Toffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Point Pelee, ON, Canada
Posts: 333
Default

I've been holding off on this thread, but I guess I can add my two cents worth... I find the TLR format so much more stable than holding an SLR up to my eyes. In most cases, I won't think twice over a shutter speed of 1/15. I'm a whole lot more selective at 1/8, and begin to question my sanity at 1/4... One odd side effect of this is that occasionally I will find myself dialing in a really slow speed on my Nikon before I realize what I'm up to.
__________________
Tom, on Point Pelee, Canada

Ansel Adams had the Zone System... I'm working on the points system. First I points it here, and then I points it there...

http://tomoverton.images.googlepages.com
Toffle is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-12-2008, 01:09 PM   #26 (permalink)
 
Q.G.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 204
Default

Any speed you can shoot, i can shoot slower.
I can shoot any speed slower than you.
No you can't!
Yes i can!
No you can't!
Yes i can!
No you can't!
Yes i can, yes i can!


Shoot a picture, with the camera of your choice, handheld, at 1/250.
Then put the camera on a tripod and shoot the same picture, at 1/250 again.
Examine and compare the results, and then you will see what MF is capable of
... if only we would use tripods.

Last edited by Q.G.; 07-12-2008 at 01:15 PM. Reason: Got the lyrics wrong ;)
Q.G. is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 01:13 PM   #27 (permalink)
 
Rolleiflexible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 936
Default

My wife Melanie has been shooting a
2.8E recently. She often shoots at
slow shutter speeds, with stunning
results. Here is a photograph she
took a couple of weeks ago, f/2.8
at one second:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/reneeking/2626540735/

Melanie has an uncanny ability to
shoot slow speeds handheld. QG,
this photograph would never have
worked with the camera on a tripod.

Sanders
Rolleiflexible is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 01:58 PM   #28 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 838
Default

Yes but I don't think setting the camera on the floor counts as hand held...
Dennis
dpurdy is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 02:27 PM   #29 (permalink)
 
2F/2F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 947
Default

"Shoot a picture, with the camera of your choice, handheld, at 1/250.
Then put the camera on a tripod and shoot the same picture, at 1/250 again.
Examine and compare the results, and then you will see what MF is capable of
... if only we would use tripods."

Of course you are right...but 95% of my favorite prints of all time, shot in a variety of formats, absolutely could not have been taken if the shooters had followed your advice.
__________________
2F/2F
2F/2F is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-12-2008, 04:36 PM   #30 (permalink)
 
Rolleiflexible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 936
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpurdy View Post
Yes but I don't think setting the camera
on the floor counts as hand held...
It wasn't on the floor. It was
a foot off the floor, held low.
(Which is why a tripod was
out of the question.)
Rolleiflexible is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:00 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using