Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,329   Posts: 1,537,180   Online: 818
      
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 39
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Rye, Uk
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    20

    which rolleiflex twin lens reflex

    I am thinking of buying a twin lens rolleiflex, I am unsure which one to go for.

  2. #2
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69
    How much are you willing to spend?
    Do you want a new one or a used one?
    How old do care about it being?
    Do you care if the lens is Carl Zeiss or Schneider?
    Do you care for 2.8 or 3.5?
    Do you need a built-in light meter?
    Do you care for TTL?
    Do you care if you need to replace the dim finder with a brighter one?
    Do you need a self timer?
    Is there a chance you will change the Waist Lever Finder for a Prism?

    My thread on getting one has lots of information:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum51/4...iflex-e-u.html
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  3. #3
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,253
    Images
    148
    or would you buy the cheaper option of all the above, a Rolleicord

    Ari's first question is the most important, what's your budget.

    Ian

  4. #4
    Mark Antony's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    East Anglia,UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    772
    Images
    38
    Hi not so long back I was in the same position, it depends on how much you want to spend but here's what I looked at:
    New Rollei GX is about £2,500 at Robert White.
    A good secondhand F either Xenotar or Planar will be around £500 for a good model recently serviced (FFordes have a couple)

    Or look for a good user model for about £200 and have it serviced about £80-120 for a good service.

    What did I do?
    I bought a Rolleiflex T which has a Tessar F3,5 for £100 on ebay then sent it to Brian Mickleboro for a service.
    I write about it in my blog:
    Rolleiflex T

    Some consider the T inferior to the F models, but I like the Tessar and if you stop down to F8-11 you can tell the difference IMHO.
    Just some food for thought.
    Mark

  5. #5
    Rolleiflexible's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York City
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,274
    Images
    31
    Buy for condition, not for model.
    The differences from model to
    model, lens to lens, are not much
    important for most people. Find
    one that has been well-cared for
    and reasonably priced. Then send
    it to a known Rolleiflex repair shop
    for a good cleaning and a new
    viewscreen (Maxwell or Beattie).

    Sanders

  6. #6
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,253
    Images
    148
    Don't forget there are also some excellent alternatives like Yashicamat's and Minolta Autocord's available second-hand, and just slightly larger but more versatile with their interchangeable lenses the Mamiya C3/33/330 and C2's. The Yashinons' and mamiya Sekor lenses are superb.

    Ian

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN US
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,252
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Mark Antony View Post
    ...Some consider the T inferior to the F models, but I like the Tessar and if you stop down to F8-11 you can tell the difference IMHO.
    Just some food for thought.
    Mark

    I assume you mean "you can't tell the difference".

  8. #8
    IloveTLRs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,000
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    or would you buy the cheaper option of all the above, a Rolleicord
    I dunno, maybe it's just the local price trend, but I was able to get a Rolleiflex Automat for less than a Rolleicord

    Quote Originally Posted by arigram View Post
    Do you care for 2.8 or 3.5?
    That's one of the biggest factors I've seen, when it comes to price. I've found 3.5s to be much cheaper than 2.8s. Again, might be a local thing.
    Those who know, shoot film

  9. #9
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,253
    Images
    148
    It's not the quality of the lenses when choosing an f2.8 over an f3.5 it's the ability to work in lower light levels, that makes an f2.8 lens far more desirable. Simple supply & demand pushes the prices up for the f2.8's.

    Both my TLR's have f3.5 lenses, sure I'd prefer an f2.8 lens on my Rolleiflex but as I was given the camera about 20 years ago I'm not complaining.

    Sometimes strange things happen with second-hand prices and camera models, I've not really noticed with Rollei's but I have spotted that the budget Pentax Spotmatic 1000's & 500's often fetch more than the full spec Spotmatic II and F.

    Ian

  10. #10
    aparat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Saint Paul, MN
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    428
    Images
    39
    I can understand your frustration. I went through the same process a while back. There have been so many Rolleiflex models, and it's really hard to find the "right" one. Eventually, I went for a Minolta Autocord, at a very low price and in good condition. I had it overhauled and had a Maxwell screen installed. I simply could not be happier. The focusing is very easy and very accurate. The controls are easy to operate. The lens is more than sharp enough for me. The camera is light and small. It even has a flash shoe on the side and a built-in meter. Finally, the cost of Autocord CLA and repair is much lower than that of a Rolleiflex.

    I hope this post helps you instead of complicating things. If you really want a Rolleiflex, I second the opinion that you should go for one in as good a condition as you can afford, and factor in the cost of a CLA and a bright focusing screen. You may be able to do all of those for just under $1000, but be prepared to pay more .

    aparat

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin