Discussions: 42,930 | Messages: 577,882 | Members: 28,187 | Online: 224 | Chatroom: 1
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Medium Format Cameras and Accessories > Kirk vs Acratech plates for Mamiya 7 and Hasselblad

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2008, 08:22 PM   #11 (permalink)
 
jeroldharter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,142
Default

I have 3 different Acratech plates to use with an Acratech ball head. Very well made aluminum. No problems. Would buy again.
__________________
Jerold Harter MD
jeroldharter is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-15-2008, 11:37 PM   #12 (permalink)
 
Andrey Donchev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 76
Default Hassy foot

Away from your question, but . . . . Have you thought about this regarding your Hasselblad. I had one and was very happy with it.
__________________
A fool with mission!
Andrey Donchev is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-15-2008, 11:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,012
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrey Donchev View Post
Away from your question, but . . . . Have you thought about this regarding your Hasselblad. I had one and was very happy with it.
Ooooooh . . . I'll have to look into that.
Terence is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-16-2008, 03:43 AM   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: England
Posts: 374
Default

I use the Kirk plate with my Mamiya 7II and they fit beautifully - low profile and don't affect the camera's operation. I also use Kirk plates on my Nikon FM2n and Leica M6, but their Mamiya plate is definitely the nicest of the lot.
__________________
My website: Light Work
bwakel is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-16-2008, 10:22 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
fotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Geneva, WI area
Posts: 202
Default

I purchase a Acratech for my Nikon and later purchased Kirks and Really Right Stuff used on the bay. While the Acratech does work, they are cheaper (new) for a reason and I would never buy another one.
JMHO
__________________
Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com
fotch is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-16-2008, 03:48 PM   #16 (permalink)
 
jeroldharter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,142
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotch View Post
I purchase a Acratech for my Nikon and later purchased Kirks and Really Right Stuff used on the bay. While the Acratech does work, they are cheaper (new) for a reason and I would never buy another one.
JMHO
What was the matter with the Acratech? I have one and am happy with it. They are all just a piece of aluminum with a screw.
__________________
Jerold Harter MD
jeroldharter is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-17-2008, 12:02 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
fotch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Geneva, WI area
Posts: 202
Default

The contact area was not flat and needed shims to make full contact with the camera plate. Without the shims the camera would be somewhat loose on the plate which makes it useless to mount on a tripod.

Although not as important, I found the stud design annoying. The threaded stud falls out of the plate when not attached as compared to the others that are machined so the remained attached to the plate.

Comparing the three of them side by side, the material, machining, and design of the Kirk & RRS made them my choice, YMMV.
__________________
Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com
fotch is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-19-2008, 03:52 PM   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 138
Default

Hi Terence,

I use RRS plates on all my cameras mounted onto either the RRS BH-55 ballhead or the lightweight Acratech (original) ballhead. This combo has worked flawlessly for years. One caveat though...if the mounting plate on your ballhead uses a "quick clamp" style setup, then be VERY careful which plates you use. For example, RRS warns its customers that the Acratech plates are not safe to use with their ballheads. I think it has something to do with a very slight difference in height. Anyway, you should check this out if it applies to your situation. Ballheads with screw-type clamps are not an issue; apparently, they're okay with any plate.

Hope this helps.
__________________
Regards,
Alan Huntley
www.silverscapephoto.com
Alan9940 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 

  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using