Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,710   Posts: 1,548,637   Online: 1128
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Ensign Selfix

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Falkland Islands: not any more now I'm in Lincolnshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    198

    Ensign Selfix

    I have just processed the first film from my Ensign Selfix 820 that I have owned for nearly 2 years but have just had the shutter serviced. The negs look amazing! I have an RB67 and a Fuji GW690 and I am fearing that they may have just become obsolete. Neither of those will fit in my pocket, and I certainly don't have "deep" pockets.

  2. #2
    Allan Swindles's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Wirral, England.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    250
    My first 'real' camera was a 12/120 Ensign Selfix with a superb Ross Xpress lens. To this day I regret ever letting it go. Enjoy it.
    I'm into painting with light - NOT painting by numbers!

  3. #3
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,859
    Unfortunately I'm old enough to remember the Haughton Ensign Selfix although I have never owned one, the Ross Xpress was indeed a very fine lens, I'm pleased to hear that someone appreciates, and is willing to spend Cash on fixing one .
    Ben

  4. #4
    simulatordan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Ludgvan Nr. Penzance Cornwall
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    219
    Images
    5
    Hello NormanV,

    I have an Ensign Selfix 820 which I bought a few years ago as a cheap entry into medium format. I was suprised to find that I could use it in 6 x 6 and 6 x 9 format with either 12 or 8 exposures to the roll; it is also possible to have 6 x 7.5 as well by adjusting the little 'blinds' before loading the film.

    My camera works very well with the exception of the shutter release llinkage which is a bit worn and sometimes fails to fire; I'v got round this be using the cable release instead.

    Enjoy it its a fine little camera.

    Regards Daniel
    Last edited by simulatordan; 08-04-2008 at 09:38 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: typo

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pennines
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    146
    After using an 820 for a few years now, I wouldnt be without it. Mine is used on 6x9 all the time - I took out the flaps in the camera back. I've messed around with a few xpres 105 lenses and the best of them is really good, especially around f16 - there is an amazingly large centre circle of pin sharpness, although I have to say sometimes the edges can be soft a bit, and weirdly this appears at infinity in a scene and not closer to the camera. Even then it is a nit picking softness that I dont mind at all.
    A few things I've also noticed -
    A lens hood is a good idea (42mm push fit - e-*a*)
    Also 42mm push fit filters are a good idea
    I glued a rectangular piece of an old 5x4 darkslide onto the film pressure plate because I found the original plate missed the film in places - it dosnt now!
    I also added some light seal foam round the back opening so it will take Delta 3200 without worrying.
    The bellows dont like getting wet - or damp!
    The viewfinder is sometimes brilliant and sometimes a real pain
    It is though one of the few cameras from the olden days that can give negs that are really very good, although some folks will say otherwise - probably a quality control issue with lens production at Ross in the 50's I imagine.
    Glad to hear others are using and liking what has become one of my favourite cameras.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Falkland Islands: not any more now I'm in Lincolnshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    198
    I am sorry to say but when I printed them I was disappointed with the sharpness. It won't be taking over as my number one camera but I might keep it in the car for chance shots. My Fuji will remain my first choice.

  7. #7
    JPD
    JPD is offline
    JPD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Sweden
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    772
    I had an Ensign Selfix 820 and was disappointed at first, but then I noticed that the lens/shutter assembly was loose, so I just tightened the locking ring. I really liked the built-in mask for 6x6.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pennines
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    146
    Norman
    Dont be put off quite yet! I think the first thing to do is to check the lens is set up OK. The front lens element that does the focusing not only rotates in and out but it is adjustable via 3 tiny slot head grub screws round its ring. If you can, take this ring off, put a piece of ground glass over the film gate - or I sometimes use a piece off a hard CD case roughened up on one side with a pan scourer, put the camera on a tripod, then turn the front lens cell till it focuses on something at infinity - easy in the Falklands!. If you are happy that you have infinity, pop the ring back on without moving the lens element and tighten the little screws up so the rod out of the shutter is against the rod of the ring, ie the ring stops turning at infinity.
    I've noticed that if I use the red dot on the focusing things are sharp from about 20 feet to infinity at something like f16, and I have to say even with a distant landscape type pic where everything is at infinity I'll still use the red dot and stop down. Also I've found that once an accurate infinity is set, the distance numbers round the focusing ring are pretty accurate.
    When I first started using this camera a lot I had to remind myself that it was a 105mm lens, because I couldnt get a decently sharp image hand held - especially at f16, but using Delta 400 or HP5 with the camera on a monopod I can get sharp negs even using a 25th shutter speed, and it goes without saying a tripod solves all shake problems.
    Its worth also checking out the film pressure plate, as it is no hassle to stick something on it to make it actually hold the film rather than do nothing - those old folders have quite a suck on the film if opened too quick even though there is an light tight airway on the shutter mounting ring.
    I dont know if this all sounds like too much faffing! I have to say I spent possibly too long messing with my 820, but I'm glad I did as it is now a usable camera - especially if the lens is used between f11 - f22. I've done a few 28 inch wide prints from it that are dead good.
    Dont shove it in the attic yet!

  9. #9
    Russ Young's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Blue Ridge of Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    206
    Images
    1
    I have TWO Ensign 6x6 (and leather case) with the superb Ross Xpres lens. I don't believe any older folder will be as sharp as the Fujinon lens but these are pretty fine. Something must be out of whack on yours. Could there be a film on the inner lens surfaces from evaporated shutter lubricant? Did you test it on a tripod to eliminate any possibility of shake? Don't despair!

    Russ Young

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Falkland Islands: not any more now I'm in Lincolnshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    198
    I have had the shutter out for repair and reset the focus but I am not absolutely certaain that it is perfect. But surely a distant shot at f11 would have something in focus? I havn't given up on it yet. I have a Ross Xpres 6" f4 lens that compares well with with sharpness but not contrast of a 150mm f4 Componon lens at 10 feet. I was hoping for something similar from my Selfix.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin