Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,974 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 300 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
636 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Medium Format Cameras and Accessories > Bronica SQ - vignetting or light leak ?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-06-2008, 06:06 AM   #11 (permalink)
 
benjiboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 1,241
Default

If I had this problem, before I did anything drastic, I'd shoot a fresh in date roll of film ,and get it processed at another lab.
__________________
Ben

Last edited by benjiboy; 09-06-2008 at 06:12 AM.
benjiboy is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-06-2008, 11:07 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
glbeas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Roswell, Ga. USA
Posts: 2,883
Default

I agree with Benjiboy. From what I know of SQ cameras theres not anything to make a vignette in that orientation. It looks more like a processing issue. It may have been the result of problems the lab was having getting decent prints from the old film.
__________________
Gary Beasley
glbeas is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-06-2008, 11:48 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
MikeSeb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Prospect (Louisville), KY, USA
Posts: 430
Default

I vote for a processing or scanning issue. It's too even and regular to be a light leak at the edge of the film, such as you'd see from a not-tightly-enough-wound film spool; those are more irregular.

You can also see this with certain film scanners along the edges of the film; i've never understood if fully but it has something to do with the way the light source is reflected back or otherwise distorted. Especially visible when there are large expanses of even, lighter tone such as sky.
__________________
Mike Sebastian
Website | Blog
MikeSeb is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-06-2008, 12:03 PM   #14 (permalink)
KPT
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 134
Default

I had the same issue once with a roll of 120. My issue was that i put the roll upside down in the tank and that caused the reel to be 1/4 above the developer and gave my that dark band through the entire roll.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6677.jpg (200.8 KB, 14 views)

Last edited by KPT; 09-06-2008 at 12:15 PM.
KPT is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-06-2008, 12:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
 
DWThomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 564
Default

As an SQ-A owner, I concur with benjiboy, glbeas and MikeSeb. The mirror/light baffle travels vertically, so unless you took these shots with the camera laying on its side, that couldn't produce that shadow. Light leaks produce lighter areas, not darker, in the final positive image.

DaveT
DWThomas is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 09-06-2008, 12:37 PM   #16 (permalink)
 
Andy K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sunny Southend, England.
Posts: 7,072
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KPT View Post
I had the same issue once with a roll of 120. My issue was that i put the roll upside down in the tank and that caused the reel to be 1/4 above the developer and gave my that dark band through the entire roll.
I did the same thing with the second roll through my SQAi. I was mighty pee'd off at myself because I got some really nice fog shots on that roll: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...etPierR2-1.jpg
__________________


-----------My Flickr-----------
The Earth has music for those who listen
Andy K is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-06-2008, 10:34 PM   #17 (permalink)
 
MattKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Delta, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 2,463
Default

You aren't, by any chance, using a lens shade are you?

If so, is it the right one?

Matt
MattKing is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-07-2008, 05:14 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Ukraine
Posts: 20
Default

I use standard square lens shade which came with the lens.
but I don't put it on most of the time, so there isn't a difference between the shots with/or without shade

I have one roll of Delta 400 undeveloped, and if this roll will not have the same defect - it's a lab issue
awaken77 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-11-2008, 03:06 PM   #19 (permalink)
 
evilhomer78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 45
Default

I would take the back and the lens off of the body and flip the mirror lock up then look through the body. There may be something protruding from the side of the body. In my sq-a there is foam lining the body. Its a possibility some of the foam is coming unstuck in your camera. Also Look at the back without the insert or dark slide in to see if there is something where the dark slide goes. I had a back that had some paper wedged in there from a previous owner, how it got there I have no idea.
evilhomer78 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-11-2008, 03:43 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dedham, Ma, USA
Posts: 466
Default

A roll taken from the freezer and exposed before it is allowed to reach ambient temperature will look very similar after it is developed (this happened to me and it didn't seem to be a condensation problem). I would guess that the other extreme would do the same - exposure during excessive high temperature conditions. The problem is with the temperature differential, or gradient, across the film. This is my best guess.
__________________
"Pictures are not incidental frills to a text; they are essences of our distinctive way of knowing." S. J. Gould
panastasia is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using