Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,975 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 298 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
636 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Medium Format Cameras and Accessories > Is my lens bad?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2008, 03:10 AM   #11 (permalink)
 
Kevin Kehler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 57
Default

This might sound like a stupid suggestion but I had noticed a significant drop in sharpness of prints about a year ago. I thought that perhaps the lens elements were loose or the focus screen was off; turns out one of my eyes made a significant change in prescription strength and since I used that eye to focus, the pictures were off. My eye doctor said these changes can happen suddenly or gradually. A $100 visit to the optometrist might save a $500+ camera repair if you haven't had your eyes checked recently.
__________________
http://www.kishphotography.com

I would rather learn to sing from a single songbird than teach ten thousand stars not to dance. e.e.cummings
Kevin Kehler is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 04:09 AM   #12 (permalink)
 
Andy38's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lyon , France
Posts: 35
Default

Kevin , it's not a stupid suggestion : I have solved a focus problem with -3d eyepiece correction lenses , because I don't like to use glasses while photographying .

An other suggestion : many lenses don't give sharp images at full aperture and it's better at f:5,6 and more .
Perhaps some tests at several apertures could give some information...
(I say that , but I have a 50mm Sekor RB67 C lens which is bad at f:4,5 and also bad at f:8...)

Last edited by Andy38; 09-16-2008 at 04:20 AM.
Andy38 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 05:23 AM   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: near Freiburg, Germany
Posts: 12
Default

I have nothing to offer than a few stupid questions and suggestions :

- If you use an "N" Type lens you should be ok with DOF. The DOF-Scales on the older non "N" lenses
were way to optimistic.
- Do you use a waistlevel finder and if so, do you use the loupe for focussing ?
- You're not using 120 film with a 220 back ? I don't know if this is technically possible but who knows.
- Just for comparison, use a tripod or put the camera on a wall or chair or what's available
for a shot, and then mirror up, cable release and see if this helps.
- Check if the groundglas is properly seated.
- Do the negatives actually appear sharp ? It seems you make your own enlargement, it could as well be, that
there is something going wrong there. And yes more contrast does make prints appear sharper.
noumin is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 08:26 AM   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 410
Default

Not my eyes--still 20/20 and I shoot a Nikon with a plain focusing screen rather than the rangefinder in the Mamiya, which makes focusing easier (and I have also shot at infinity with no sharpnes anywhere). Not the aperture--occurs at f8 and f16. It's a later N model lens. I use the eye level prism, not a waist level finder. Enlarger is fine for other formats and cameras.
jmal is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 08:39 AM   #15 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,676
Default

Before you do anything else check the lens focus like I suggested early. If you don't have a glass screen to put across the film plane then waxed paper used in cooking or tracing paper will work just tape it tight. Put the camera on a tripod focus on something using the normal screen/prism finder then fire the shutter on B and see if the image is sharp at the film plane.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 09-16-2008, 10:56 AM   #16 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 410
Default

Ian, how do I get the wax paper in/on the film plane. the body doesn't have a removable back, so the film plane is inside the body. Thanks.
jmal is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 11:16 AM   #17 (permalink)
 
Anscojohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 620
Default

If the image on the ground glass looks sharp, it must be the ground glass or the mirror which is the culprit, it seems to me.
__________________
John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA
Anscojohn is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 11:16 AM   #18 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 406
Default

As a comment on your G1 and G2 difference, that could well be the contrast effect creating a "perceived" increase in sharpness. This is not real and is more about how the eye resolves images. Is the improvement of the sharpness perceptible in areas of continuous tone or are you perceiving it at the edges (more likely to be related to contrast increase?)

If it was me, i would set up a controlled test with the existing lens, set to infinity, and also close up, with an f-stop set two stops down from fully open on a tripod. I would then pay a visit to a shop with exactly the same film and set-up in camera and take a couple of pictures with a new lens, on the pormise to the shop that you want to check out the lens before buying it...if all the pictures are the same after development, then you may be looking at a viewing screen or maybe even a film plane issue...

Finally...are you sure the sharpness is not lost in the printing stage....?

K
Shangheye is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 11:26 AM   #19 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 410
Default

Shangheye, the sharpness is on egdes and I agree with you that this is probably perceived sharpness due to contrast. Also, I'm in luck for testing because a friend works at a local store and I can try any of the bodies. lenses, and prisms for free. No explanations needed. Lastly, I don't believe the sharpness is lost at the printing stage but I will be trying a news enlarger lens tomorrow. That is the only variable at the printing stage.
jmal is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-16-2008, 12:12 PM   #20 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,676
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmal View Post
Ian, how do I get the wax paper in/on the film plane. the body doesn't have a removable back, so the film plane is inside the body. Thanks.
That's a very good point, it's about10 years since I tested my 645J - I had an unmounted focus screen and used that. It showed that the focus screen was significantly out on my camera.

As you can get your friends help get the store to have a look for you.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

 


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using