Discussions: 45,159 | Messages: 608,982 | Members: 29,920 | Online: 317 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
1107 view(s)
aj 12 + various things
Author: jnanian
637 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
953 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Equipment > Medium Format Cameras and Accessories > Horseman 612

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2008, 12:44 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
Default Horseman 612

I'm thinking about buying a Horseman 612 camera, either the Pro model, which has some rise and shift, or the standard w/o those features. I'm also thinking of the 90mm lens rather than something wider. My primary interest is in the 6x12 format, which I find very pleasing. I already have an SWC for super-wide shots.

Have any of you used a Horseman 612 or 617? What about lens choice? Your comments will be much appreciated.
Arthurwg is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-22-2008, 01:08 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 4,676
Default

I shoot with a 617 but couldn't afford a Horseman or Linhof etcso bought a Gaoers1 instead. Currently I have the 90mm focussing mount and the 75mm, and I fitted a 90mm Grandagon & a 75mm Super Angulon. However I found I never used the 90mm, much preferring the 75mm because it suits the landscapes I'm shooting. The Gaoersi can be used for 6x12, 6x15 & 6x17 but I prefer the wider format.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 09-22-2008, 01:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
keithwms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,730
Blog Entries: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Arthurwg View Post
I'm thinking about buying a Horseman 612 camera, either the Pro model, which has some rise and shift, or the standard w/o those features. I'm also thinking of the 90mm lens rather than something wider. My primary interest is in the 6x12 format, which I find very pleasing. I already have an SWC for super-wide shots.

Have any of you used a Horseman 612 or 617? What about lens choice? Your comments will be much appreciated.
I had a look at the Horseman 612 and quickly concluded that it wasn't my gig, and instead made myself an ultrawide shift camera based on an enlarging back (6x9 cm to 4x5") for the horseman VH/VH-R series:

http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c7...ots/shift1.jpg

On this object I was shooting 612 roll as well as 4x5 sheet and instant film. Unfortunately this lovely accessory is very rare, and... also, I sold it recently. But nevertheless I do still have the Horseman 612 rollfilm back and can attest that it is very good. You can slap it on a crown graphic and get good results with a 90mm. I use the Schn. 90/8 SA among others. I also like the Nikkor 65 and a Rodenstock 55.

Overall, I frankly do not see the purpose of a dedicated 612 camera, for my own stuff. 617 sure, maybe; but 612 isn't something I use often enough to make that investment. But your needs are probably different...

I might part with my 612 rollfilm back for the right price.... check at mpex to see what the current prices are.
__________________
Keith Williams

My APUG Portfolio
Photography: keithwilliamsphoto.net
Physics: Nanodevice physics

"I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." - Thomas Jefferson
keithwms is online now   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 


  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using