Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,055   Posts: 1,561,365   Online: 1067
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    54

    Carl Zeiss Jena 2.8/80 Tessar lens

    I ended up with with a CZJ 2.8/80 Tessar lens on a P6 mount to add to the battery of CZJ lenses I have. Would anyone care to comment on the thing? I have never owned one or used one but I seem to have read somewhere that they were only produced for one year. It is marked 1Q and is in exe++ condition. What can I expect in use compared to the CZJ 2.8/80 biometer?
    I did a search but didn't find much, the lens seems to be kind of rare in that mount.

  2. #2
    kman627's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    101
    Images
    29
    That the first time I've ever heard of one. Have you tried it yet?

  3. #3
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,058
    Images
    38
    As I understand from Rollei lore, the Tessar was difficult to make 2.8 in the 80mm and it might be rather a poor performer until you get down to 5.6 or so.
    \
    Dennis

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Holland and Brazil
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,066
    You will have to test and compare it.
    It seems that this lens was made for the East German (DDR) market only and came to the west after november 1989.

    Peter

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Northern Nevada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by archphoto View Post
    You will have to test and compare it.
    It seems that this lens was made for the East German (DDR) market only and came to the west after november 1989.

    Peter
    That was my next step, The quick roll I shot to test a P6 camera looked pretty sharp in the corners but I never got smaller than F4. David

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    If the f/2.8 80 mm Tessar Zeiss (west) made for Hasselblad is anything to go by, it will not be a great lens.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Holland and Brazil
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,066
    @ Q.G.:
    Jena is a university (optical) town in eastern Germany, former DDR.

    After WW2 Germany was split up into 2 parts: Eastern Germany and Western Germany, this lasted until november 1989 when the Berlin Wall came down.

    After WW2 Zeiss was plit up into Carl Zeiss Jena (east) and Zeiss (Oberkochen) (west)

    Carl Zeiss Jena made quite a few Tessars, the best known are the 50mm Tessars for the Praktica's.

    Peter

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Peter,

    I know about the history of Zeiss.
    But thanks anyway.

    I also know that a Tessar is a Tessar is a Tessar ...
    Not the best lenses Zeiss (unsplit - either of the two parts - nor the re-united Zeiss) ever made.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Holland and Brazil
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,066
    You are right with the quality................

  10. #10
    André E.C.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finland
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,520
    Images
    12
    The 3.5's are lovely, I have 2 of them!



    Cheers



    Good



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin