Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,217   Posts: 1,532,131   Online: 1045
      
Page 1 of 13 123456711 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 123
  1. #1
    skyrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Arlington, TX
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    305
    Images
    1

    Apollo 11 Hasselblad photos.

    http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...tos/index.html

    You've gotta love the NY Times. Even though they no longer even have a darkroom in the building, they keep on giving us access to some great photos; either via their Lens blog or articles like this.

    Rick

  2. #2
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,060
    Thanks,

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Richmond VA.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,784
    I enjoyed those photos, thanks Rick!

    Jeff

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    100
    Anybody know what film and lenses they used?

  5. #5
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,492
    Lenses:

    Zeiss (Oberkochen) Biogon 60mm, Planar 80mm, Planar 100mm and UV-Sonnar 105.

    The camera with the reseau-plate only took the Biogon. Which was recalculated, not at least due the distorting refraction of the plate.


    Films:

    Ektachrome MS (SO)

    (Ektachrome EF (SO); maybe)

    High Resolution Aerial color film (SO)

    Panatomic X Aerial

    High Speed Recording

    All films on PET base and all emulsions in use outside of the Apollo project before. (I can't specify on Apollo 11)

  6. #6
    Anscojohn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,727
    Images
    13
    [QUOTE=skyrick;828062]http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...tos/index.html

    ******
    Ah, c'mon, everyone knows all that was done on a sound stage in Burbank.
    John, Mount Vernon, Virginia USA

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    Yep.
    But what film and lenses were used?

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    100
    AgX, that is one authoritative answer. Thanks!

  9. #9
    Wade D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Jamul, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    881
    Images
    3
    The astronauts left the cameras on the moon so they could bring back more rocks.
    Maybe next time I'm there I'll bring back a few of them. Would be worth a fortune now. Oh, I forgot, I don't have a space ship.:rolleyes:
    BTW great images from NYT now that I'm back to reality.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    283
    Does anyone know what the exposure would be required on the surface of the moon sunlit side? Is it brighter than EV 15, sunny f16 rule?
    Sam H.

Page 1 of 13 123456711 ... LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin