Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,702   Posts: 1,548,452   Online: 908
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    248

    Whats the lightest 645 camera ever made?

    Any ideas for a light useable semi-modern 645?
    Thanks!
    I brake for fixer!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfTales View Post
    Any ideas for a light useable semi-modern 645?
    Thanks!
    I am guessing that one of the modern Fuji folders might fit your needs. These cameras as quite light and compact and give negatives of high optical quality, much better than you would get from the vintage folders.

    Sandy King

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,325
    Images
    20
    Bronica 645RF would seem to be another contender.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #4
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    The lightest 645 ever made? I guess that would be a holga Is 140g light enough? of course then you have to put on 200g of tape and glue to combat the light leaks... :rolleyes:

    I would broaden the search to 6x6 folders. I would consider maybe one of the Agfa Isolettes, or maybe one of the Zeiss Ikontas. Or maybe one of the original mamiya-6 folders. There are a whole bunch of 120/220 folders. There seems to be a pretty good list here...

    http://www.pibweb.com/ross/Campix/folders.htm

    Sandy is right though, if you are looking for a modern, non-folder 645, the fixed-lens Fujis are the probably lightest. Some of the models aren't exactly compact, but they are light and lots of fun. Nice thing about them: they are vertical (portrait orientation) 645s. Some people say they are plasticky, but actually they are very well built and can take some hard knocks.

    P.S. I am a big proponent of the mamiya 6 (the modern one) and the body + lens weighs in a just over a kilo... comparable to a Nikon F100 + lens, if that says anything to you. And a 3-lens 6 kit is actually more compact than a typical F100 kit.

    P.P.S. The lightest 645 slr that I possess is the mamiya 645 pro, which is considerably lighter than the pentax 645N, IIRC. But there are probably some slightly lighter ones.
    Last edited by keithwms; 08-16-2009 at 04:54 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  5. #5
    brian steinberger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    2,331
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    100
    Bronica RF645. Amazing camera. Can't seem to say enough good things about it.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by brian steinberger View Post
    Bronica RF645. Amazing camera. Can't seem to say enough good things about it.

    For just a tad more weight, and less money on average, one could buy a Fuji GA645Zi, an auto-exposure, auto-focus camera with a 55-90mm variable focus lens. The quality of the variable focus lens is outstanding, on a par with fixed focus lenses at every one of the focal lengths, which as I recall are 55-65-75-90mm.

    These cameras have been selling on ebay for around $500-600 USD.

    Sandy King

  7. #7
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    The bronica ETR is a very small 645, if not one of the lightest, just look at it in comparison to the RB67

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    248
    The Fuji and the Bronica seem like great little systems. I already work with Mamiya so I'd like to try another company out...

    It's too bad they didn't make a little subminiature 645 camera... that would have been neet.

    Thanks for the ideas!
    I brake for fixer!

  9. #9
    keithwms's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Charlottesville, Virginia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,079
    Blog Entries
    20
    Images
    129
    Quote Originally Posted by WolfTales View Post
    It's too bad they didn't make a little subminiature 645 camera...
    Closest thing would be a folder, some of them are very compact.
    "Only dead fish follow the stream"

    [APUG Portfolio] [APUG Blog] [Website]

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    680
    The Fuji wins on small. But the Bronica RF645 is a much nicer camera to use and focus with. A RF645 is the closest thing to a medium format Leica. All three lenses are exceptional. The 100mm is sharp without hashness; good OOF rendering.
    RJ

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin