Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 57,953   Posts: 1,195,017   Online: 968
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 32 of 32
  1. #31

    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    S Florida
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by Andy38 View Post
    The first Rolleiflex built with coated lenses is the Automat 3, or K4B2, made from 1945 to 1949, with Tessar Carl Zeiss Jena, Tessar Opton or Xenar (Schneider).

    But some earlier may have been coated many years after they were built; here is an Original (~1931) with a coated taking lens (Tessar f3,8); I suppose it was coated after WWII... Sometimes I use it : at f8, lens is nearly as sharp as a later Automat coated lens.
    Andy .. That's a great old Rollei. Wish I had a real old one like it. I've got a newer one with a 2.8 Planar (incredible lens). The coated lens on your camera is very interesting. Where did you get the info on the date of that camera and lens? I would sure like to read more about the optic history of the Rollei's.

  2. #32
    Andy38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Lyon , France
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    141
    Quote Originally Posted by John R. View Post
    Andy .. That's a great old Rollei. Wish I had a real old one like it. I've got a newer one with a 2.8 Planar (incredible lens). The coated lens on your camera is very interesting. Where did you get the info on the date of that camera and lens? I would sure like to read more about the optic history of the Rollei's.
    I don't know much more about this camera .Serial numbers on front (106xxx) and on Tessar taking lens (1304xxx) let me think this camera is from 1931.

    But I try to understand why it was modified...
    All elements on taking lens were coated; camera has a synchro X (not M : flash fires when shutter blades are wide open) and ground glass screen is brighter than on other Original's, with a glued rangefinder spot on its center (perfectly working).
    I suppose these modifications were expensive.
    Why not buying a post-WWII Rolleicord, with its coated lenses and a more robust construction ? It's easier to use; and it uses 120 rollfilm; Original doesn't, only 117, or 620 when modified.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE:


 
                     

Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin