Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,511   Posts: 1,543,569   Online: 1067
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,117
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    A24's are not more expensive than A12s.

    That is, if you find ones that are, know then that they shouldn't be: people have been rushing to dump those on a large scale, since there is very little film you can run through an A24 back left, and as soon as the very few remaining films are discontinued in 220 format, these backs can only be used as desk ornaments.

    So i'd consider an A24 a free extra with no real value.
    Exactly why I do not have an A24 back.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

  2. #12

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    A24's are not more expensive than A12s.

    That is, if you find ones that are, know then that they shouldn't be: people have been rushing to dump those on a large scale, since there is very little film you can run through an A24 back left, and as soon as the very few remaining films are discontinued in 220 format, these backs can only be used as desk ornaments.

    So i'd consider an A24 a free extra with no real value.
    I run 120 film through A24 backs all the time with no problems...in fact this has been discussed quite a bit in this forum with the same conclusion...not sure why such a preposterous statement like "there is very little film you can run though an A24 back left" is stated with such authority.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,686
    You can transport an elephant on a one donkey cart too. Doesn't mean that it's the way to do it.

    You can indeed run 120 film through a 24 back.
    Spacing will be off (how do you archive your film?), and you never know whether you get all 12 frames on a roll.

    And why would you?
    Good to know, perhaps, when you happen to have 120 film, must shoot something, but all you have available is a 24 back. Else, with so many 12 backs available, i really wouldn't bother.

    A24 backs are being dumped, because the choice of 220 films is extremely limited. Putting a higher value on them than on A12 backs isn't realistic.
    And that's the only other reason why you would try running 120 film through 220 backs: you can't afford the more expensive (!) 120 back.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    459
    Thanks for the advice. It does not look like the seller will accept my offer so i will check Ebay for a kit. Thanks!

  5. #15
    Sirius Glass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    13,117
    Quote Originally Posted by J Rollinger View Post
    Thanks for the advice. It does not look like the seller will accept my offer so i will check Ebay for a kit. Thanks!
    Check KEH.com for conservative equipment ratings and return policy both of which evilBay does not have.

    Steve
    Warning!! Handling a Hasselblad can be harmful to your financial well being!

    Nothing beats a great piece of glass!

    I leave the digital work for the urologists and proctologists.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin