Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,550   Posts: 1,544,876   Online: 948
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    59

    Prisms and Winders: Are they worthy?

    I'm considering purchasing a MF 6x6 (Hasselblad 503CW). The one that I rented last weekend had a prism and a winder with it. Although that made it more like the 35mm to which I am accustomed, I am wondering whether their utility is worth the extra bulk, fiddling, funds, etc.

    Do you use a prism finder or a winder? Do you find it worthwhile?

    Again, I deeply appreciate your taking the time and energy to respond!

  2. #2
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,034
    Images
    30
    Pam,
    are you doing weddings or something else that requires auto film advance? If not, don't waste the money. The winder is expensive and bulky.

    As for finders, I have the PM45 and never use it. I mostly use the waist level. Maybe because that is how I learned to see with this camera. But I would start off with the bare minimums first. Then buy as you need.

    Good luck,
    david

  3. #3
    harveyje's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    166
    I use both a prism and the WL finder. The prism is nice but not necessary if you can learn to accommodate the laterally reversed image. I actually use the WL finder most of the time as I usually use a tripod or monopod. The winder would be nice to have but, again, is not necessary as you will be most likely working at a slower pace. If you decide on either be sure to check ebay and other used sources for less expenditure.

    Others may have different opinions. It really depends on what you want to do with the camera.
    John Harvey
    Colorado Springs, CO
    harveyje@usa.net

  4. #4
    fingel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    298
    Images
    4
    I have used both, but don't have either. I have always found it easier for the way I work to use the waist-level finder and no winder. The reversed image doesn't bother me, I guess I am just used to it.
    Scott Stadler

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,576
    Images
    27
    Pamela, I use a waist level 90% of the time on my 645, though I do have a prism finder - no winder. The question I would ask myself, if I were in your shoes, compared to the cost of said finder and winder, could I get another lens or how much film,paper,developer could I buy. The winder and prism will not make your images any better, they could make it easier to take, but balance it with what you need now. Don't forget, there is still a large supply of equipment out there so pace yourself.

    Just my 2 cents...
    Mike C

    Rambles

  6. #6
    eric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,586
    Images
    55
    I have a prism but I think its more of a hassle. I find that I can compose better without it because one uses BOTH eyes for composition with WL. And that gives you (to me at least) better visual perspective that ONE eye that has limited depth perception. I like it taking the time with the WL as well.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    59
    Thank you for your responses.

    I plan to use the MF for shooting images that express my connection with the subject in a more profound way. Subjects will include nature, adults, children, etc. I do not plan to shoot in rapid succession with the MF. I will save these exposures for thought-out ideas that I'd like to translate into images.

    You make great points about the utility of each. I appreciate your thoughtful responses and look forward to hearing more.

    Thanks much.

  8. #8
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,256
    Images
    73
    no winder and no prism for me. adds to much weight.
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  9. #9
    blansky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Wine country in Northern California
    Posts
    5,029
    I have a couple of Hasselblads and use the 45 angle finder exclusively and have for many years. I don't like backwards images and I like the detail that you see with a darkened finder.( no light seeping in). I like the fact that it is faster and easier to focus if you need to do that.

    I have a 500 CM and a ELM which is the motor drive. I use the motordrive the most and for the main reason that you can use a 25 foot cable release to release the shutter. Great for shooting kids. While the camera is behind me on the tripod I can move in and move out and tickle or play and jump back and trip the shutter electronically.

    I also used to use the 25 foot cable release when I shot weddings. I used the CM hand held with a flash on it and placed the ELM in the balcony and hung the cable release over and down to the floor below. I could shoot hand held in the aisle as well as from above at the same time.

    So my recommendation is forget the motor drive for now but get the 45 degree angle finder. The learning curve will be less as it will seem more like your 35mm.


    Michael McBlane

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    I don't use a winder. I use the WLF and a "chimney" magnifiying finder for nature photography. For people shots I use a Kiev 45 degree prism finder (no meter). It fits the Hassy perfectly, is a good performer and costs less than $100. new.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin