Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,733   Posts: 1,515,331   Online: 942
      
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 40 of 40
  1. #31

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    139
    Quote Originally Posted by darinwc View Post
    Is the "C" model any different?
    The C models have a different, more modern multi-coating than the non-C lenses and are generally considered superior for color film.

    Tim

  2. #32
    CBG
    CBG is offline

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    894
    The RB generally has very good glass. If you have a sharpness problem, you either have lenses that are way off specs or were dropped when shipped etc or your focusing screen is not installed within specs.

  3. #33

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Berlin Wi.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    244
    The best thing is to have a repair place look at it through a collimator. If the image on that is sharp, then it is a problem in the viewfinder. It does appear to be a little soft. That would be great for older women, but not young gals. Ric.

  4. #34

    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    NYC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,181
    Is the lens clear or slightly hazed or dusty or dirty? Does the focus on the film plane agree with the viewfinder? Use a lens hood? Need more info n trouble shooting here, because RB lenses are generally very sharp.
    Anyone can make a Digital print, but only a photographer can make a photograph.

  5. #35

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    905
    To get an idea of how sharp, I use my Dicomed back on my RB, I get 6k x 6k images that are frighteningly sharp, they do really well on film, and really show their strengths with digital backs as well.

  6. #36
    photoncatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    NJ
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    173
    I've been shooting with the RB67 since the 70s, and I've rarely seen such good glass. Some of my negs have gone to 16x20 with no loss of sharpness, or contrast. I do agree with Terry about the tripod, and dual cable release. The RB can be a beast to hand hold.

  7. #37

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    42
    I've got a 90mm C lens, and it's pretty darned sharp. Back when I first got it, I took a full length portrait of a fellow of slightly above average height, leaving a bit of room at both the top and bottom of the frame. Under my 4X loupe, I could clearly read the writing embossed on the button holding up his jeans--it was absolutely sharp and defined.

    I would be quite pleased to know my 35mm lenses are producing such resolution and definition on an equivalent area of film. Medium format lenses generally don't need nor boast resolution as high as lenses for smaller formats, as less magnification is required for the same print size. But my 90 seems to have just as high resolution as the top-of-the-line Nikon lenses I own. With that, I am absolutely satisfied.

  8. #38

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    26
    Overall a nice image, with some comments:

    - I see flare in the image from the angle the camera is facing the sun.
    - The two subjects are at different distances from the camera. At f/5.6 this will mean difference in focus.
    - The faces are in shadow, which may not create a sharp looking image.

    Shoot a few rolls in different lighting conditions and see if you feel the same way about the lens.

  9. #39
    James Bleifus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Sonoma County, CA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    255
    Images
    10
    Quote Originally Posted by darinwc View Post
    I only have the 90mm non-C lens on the Mamiya RB 67.
    Frankly, I'm unimpressed by it.
    Unfortunately, I feel the same. Today I developed the first rolls of film from my newly purchased RB67 with a 90mm non-C lens and was very disappointed. It didn't match the sharpness or contrast of my Bronnie ETRS 75mm MC lens. That means the whole kit is going back to KEH. I love the feel of the RB over the Bronnie, but the quality of the images comes first. I know others are very fond of their 90s so I'm guessing mine has some problems.

    Cheers, James

  10. #40

    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bowling Green, OH
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22
    I've never had a problem with sharpness on my 90mm C. I've blown negatives up to 20x24 without any loss in quality and that's from me using it handheld. Though, this was in the middle of the day, with full sun, but I stopped the lens down to f/11 to give me more depth of field and bring out detail in my subject. I've found that shooting wide open is kinda sketch because you need to be dead on with your focus.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin