As per thread title.
Instead of buying a large format camera this year, i'm going to expand my Hasselblad system so i can take it to Nepal with me at the end of the year.
I've got 80mm and 150mm lenses at this point and i need a longer tele and wide.
I've decided to get a 50mm CF FLE for the wide but i have been puzzled with the 250mm lenses.
I know what the technical differences are between the non SA and SA lenses but in terms of the picture output - i can't find anything.
Has anyone here used both and can provide some examples?
I know the big guns of colour photography (Christopher Burkett et al.) use the SA lenses but is there such a massive difference between the lenses that equates to a 400% increase in price?
I know this is an opinion-seeking article but i am curious to know.
I'd be happy to rent both to try them out, but alas - nobody seems to have the elusive superachromat.