If you cut the bottom off of one plastic 35mm film canister, and then cram that into another one, you have a custom 120/220 film canister.
I use pockets, bags, car doors, etc., and never had any damage. I do like the little tubes that com with Adox film, though. Adox CHS and Efke are the same thing, so if you want to use the Efke, get the Adox instead, since it comes with the canister. Those things are pricey when you buy them separately!
"Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."
- Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)
I use the plastic M&M candies tube packages for shot rolls of film. The come in single and double length. They even have a snap cover. They are a perfect fit for 120/220 film rolls.
Originally Posted by 2F/2F
I'm happy to know I'm not the only one who thought about "film safety." If we don't obsess about every little thing, it wouldn't be a hobby would it?
Thank you VERY much about the suggestion of pill bottles!!
Develop, stop, fix.... wait.... where's my film?
Originally Posted by mikebarger
So i only worry about where to put them all.
Last edited by Poisson Du Jour; 12-14-2010 at 04:06 AM. Click to view previous post history.
.::Gary Rowan Higgins
One beautiful image is worth
a thousand hours of therapy.
"It is horrifying that we have to fight our own government
to save the environment."
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
Originally Posted by Poisson Du Jour
I can't remember the last time (which must have been the first time too) i had light spilling onto the film due to sloppy loading.
But with my bags well filled with equipment, i have to hunt for space to put film. And that's my only worry.
What i do when i want to take more film than i can cram in the equipment bag, is attach another bag, or rather that "film organizer" pouch mentioned earlier, to the bag. (It's not the name of the thing: any other large enough clip on bag/pouch would do too, but this one is about right for the job.) That takes care of almost everything. 'Almost', because it too only holds a finite amount of film.
I can't see myself even considering spending those amounts of money mentioned in the thread on 'film protectors'. On extra space, yes. But not on protectors.
Nor would i want to also have to find space for the containers (and Pelican cases???).
I remember reading recently where Ansel Adams said that a box of exposed 8x10 negatives shot while on a trip to Alaska were accidentally dropped into a lake. The box they were in was not waterproof and although it was quickly recovered most of the negatives were damaged beyond use. The famous image of Mt. McKinley was one of the survivors. He remarked that he "learned the hard way" to use a waterproof box to protect his negatives. That's one reason why I use the Otter Box and the Pelican; the other is to protect the film from physical damage. Considering that they will last a lifetime, they provide cheap insurance - $33 + tax was the cost for both cases which together will hold 15 rolls of film.
Last edited by Tom Taylor; 12-14-2010 at 08:42 AM. Click to view previous post history.
I would then rather get a large Pelican case, that not only protects film, but also the expensive equipment.
Oh, and the film would then go wherever there is room for it in the case, with no extra protection.