Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,517   Posts: 1,645,529   Online: 1131
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    winger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    southwest PA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,620
    Images
    47
    I have a 503cxi that I bought used from a wedding photographer. I've never had it CLA'd and it's doing just fine. I know I should have someone look at it, but I just haven't taken the time. The only time it jammed was when I put an extension tube on in the wrong order. The only problem I've had with mine is that it doesn't fit my hands very easily so I use it on a tripod 90% of the time.
    And my Fords have been my favorite cars.

  2. #22
    kreeger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Missouri USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    58
    Images
    18
    On Hasselblad Reliability :

    The bodies and lenses - I've been using 500C, C/M, ELM, ELX for 30 years, with the older C lenses. If you consider all the moving parts and complexity they have, Hasselblad of that type and era have been very good and on par with Nikon reliability. But, like other cameras I recommend spares are a good idea when you can afford them. You can buy a spare body for next to nothing and stripped way down they way nothing when you're miles from home. I use 500CM and ELX for my work.

    The backs - have always been known to have some irregular gaps between frames over long use. If you have one body at least have 2-3 backs and have one going and one loaded with another roll all the time. Good insurance is to take a jeweler file and put a notch in the film opening somewhere on each so you can track down a problem with the back when it's got a problem. The light seals which are user replaceable are the most common repair to them. I use a mix of older peep-hole style and late 70 style non peep hole backs.

    A agree with Bethe above - tripod is often necessary for using one.

    I have always used Hasselblads for the amazing characteristics of the lenses available. They aren't the lightest or the most ergonomic MF cameras by a long shot.
    Last edited by kreeger; 01-30-2011 at 09:15 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,783
    Quote Originally Posted by kreeger;1130612A
    agree with Bethe above - tripod is often necessary for using one.
    Me too agree. 90% of the time I use mine on tripod and the remaining 10% on monopod. These numbers are approximate and may vary.

  4. #24
    skahde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    426
    Images
    4
    I bought my equipment used and within the last 14 years each and every part I have or had needed service at some point (4 lenses, 3 mags, 2 bodies). With one exception: All the 2000fcw ever needed was a fresh battery. And it also never jammed ...

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Columbia River Gorge, WA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    100
    Just my two cents worth, but when I worked at a camera shop (oh so many years ago), the repair guy used to refer to Hasselblads as "Hassel bombs" because he would get more of them in his shop than any other camera, and yes they were, shall we say, "tempermental". That having been said, I own a Hasselblad system and even though I enjoy working with it, I feel that it could be much more reliable. Luckily for me I have a very good and reasonable repairman to work on it.

  6. #26
    Leigh B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Maryland, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,035
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Q.G. View Post
    I have one 500 C/M body, in regular use, that hasn't been serviced since i got it new 30 years ago, i.e. never. Never a problem either.
    I certainly agree with Q.G. on this.

    I've been shooting Hasselblads for over 40 years, and I repair them.

    The equipment is built like a tank. By far the most rugged design I've ever seen among all the camera brands that I've serviced, and I only work on pro-grade gear.

    All of my Hasselblad equipment except the CFV-39 was purchased used, because I can't afford the new stuff. I've never had a problem with any of it. I must confess that I never CLA any of the gear, although I should. I have serviced a couple of shutters, but that was years ago.

    Anyhow, if you hear somebody griping about Hasselblad being unreliable, close your ears.

    I can't address the quality of the new H series since I've never used or serviced any of it.

    - Leigh

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin