Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 73,115   Posts: 1,613,142   Online: 1044
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38
  1. #21
    phirehouse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Clearwater FL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    233
    Images
    7
    Get bigger pockets...then a Hasselblad
    ha ha, love it...

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,034
    Images
    99
    Quote Originally Posted by maarten m View Post
    just take it out of the pocket, take a shot and gets back in.

    thanks,
    mm
    Agfa Clack? Weighs almost nothing and easy to use. Not super-compact, though, kinda squarish, need fairly roomy pocket.
    "People get bumped off." -- Weegee

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    42
    Ensign Selfix 820 Autorange special, very nice folding 120 with a choice of 6x6 or 6x9 negative (must be decided before loading the film). I have the older and less sophisticated 420 model as a drop into a pocket MF camera. The 820 could perhaps be considered the pinacle of MF folding English cameras. The Autorange version tends to command a premium.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,659
    Quote Originally Posted by Alastair_I View Post
    Ensign Selfix 820 Autorange special, very nice folding 120 with a choice of 6x6 or 6x9 negative (must be decided before loading the film). I have the older and less sophisticated 420 model as a drop into a pocket MF camera. The 820 could perhaps be considered the pinacle of MF folding English cameras. The Autorange version tends to command a premium.
    Alastair, you're mad. Completely mad.

    I have a Selfix 820, plain vanilla without the rangefinder so not as high as yours. It won't fit in a pocket. It is a monster, is not in the running for "smallest camera that shoots 120 film." Its only virtue is that it shoots 2x3. The highly touted 105/3.7 Xpres is nowhere near as good as the 101/4.5 Ektar I use on my 2x3 Graphics. The UK doesn't have real mountains, that may be why you see a camera that doesn't stand tall as "the pinnacle."

    For a pocketable camera that uses 120 film, I concur with the posts recommending the Bessa 66 (made until 1949, I think, the one I gave away was post-WW-II) and its successor the Perkeo. My Perkeo II, again plain vanilla without the IIe's uncoupled RF, goes easily into a normal pants pocket, more easily than my Retina Ib. Nice camera, a joy to use. Mine has a Color Skopar, said to be a good lens. Not mine, I've never got a satisfactorily sharp shot with my very congenial little Perkeo II. The late Charlie Barringer had one like mine, told me he'd tested its lens carefully and found it to be not very good.

  5. #25
    rphenning's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    California
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    341
    Quote Originally Posted by 2F/2F View Post
    Get bigger pockets...then a Hasselblad.
    true on so many levels.

  6. #26
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    227
    Get bigger pockets...then a Hasselblad.
    true on so many levels.
    ha ha, love it...
    i already ruined a few coats on my 500CM :P
    clack might be light, but as you say: bulcky.

    i think i'll just go for a 35mm instead of looking for a non-folder.

    thanks for your thoughts,
    mm

  7. #27
    maarten m's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    gent belgium
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    227
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    The absolute winner of the "most compact 120 camera" is the camera that got left on the driveway and was driven over!
    lol

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Norfolk, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Dan Fromm View Post
    Alastair, you're mad. Completely mad.
    420 fits in a jacket pocket no bother.. certainly far more pocketable than my RB67

    There's smaller folders will give you a 6x6.. but why compromise on the acreage of a 6x9 negative?

  9. #29
    Heinz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dortmund, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    85
    Images
    192
    The Makina 67 is quite compact for 6x7, but the reply of Steve fits also concerning its weight. Nevertheless it is a beautiful camera!

  10. #30
    Troy Hamon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Alaska
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    291
    Quote Originally Posted by Sirius Glass View Post
    The absolute winner of the "most compact 120 camera" is the camera that got left on the driveway and was driven over!
    Unless it is a Mamiya RB...in which case it doesn't look any different than before and it's still huge...and it probably still works...

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin