Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,276   Posts: 1,534,775   Online: 829
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862

    RB67 actual image dimensions

    I don't have access to any of my RB67 negatives to measure them, but I'm trying to compare wide-angle lenses on 4x5 to their equivalents in terms of RB67 lenses. Does anyone know the length/width of the actual film gate of an RB67 back?
    f/22 and be there.

  2. #2
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,591
    Images
    122
    As luck would have it, I have an RB67 negative right here on my desk at work. The actual image size is 56mm x 69.2mm (2.21" x 2.72").


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  3. #3
    Marc Akemann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor area, Michigan
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,259
    Images
    4
    56.5 mm x 68 mm (2.22" x 2.68") is what get. I measured both the film gate of my 6x7 ProS back and a recent negative.

    -Marc
    Last edited by Marc Akemann; 06-02-2011 at 10:12 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #4
    Steve Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Ryde, Isle of Wight
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    8,591
    Images
    122
    Perhaps there is some variance in the film backs then, possibly age dependent. Mine are Pro SD backs.


    Steve.
    "People who say things won't work are a dime a dozen. People who figure out how to make things work are worth a fortune" - Dave Rat.

  5. #5
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862
    I need a very wide lens. It looks like my 50mm RB67 lens isn't actually any wider than the 90mm I have for 4x5. Bummer. Guess need to start looking for a 24mm for 35mm.
    f/22 and be there.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    746
    24mm for 35mm format is basically the same as 50mm on 6x7.

    the 37mm fisheye for the RB/RZ is the widest production lens for that system.

    Mamiya developed a 43mm aspherical rectilinear lens for the RZ back in about 2002(?) I think, but never released it, sadly.

    -Ed

  7. #7
    BetterSense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    North Carolina
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,862
    The crazy this is that you can get 50mm (47 actually) lenses for 4x5, if you have like $2500 to spend. According to my calculations that would be like a 28mm lens on 6x7. I wonder how they pull that off?
    f/22 and be there.

  8. #8
    hpulley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,214
    Images
    75
    The rear mask, rotating adapter and film back size and age determine the image size. The 6x8 adapter actually gives 56x76mm in portrait only. On a Polaroid or sheet film back you get a 76x76mm image (73x76mm on 3.25x4.25" Polaroid).

    A 17mm lens on 135 is hard to beat for wide angle but on my RB67 the 65mm lens seems wide enough for some reason.
    Last edited by hpulley; 06-02-2011 at 01:12 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Harry Pulley - Visit the BLIND PRINT EXCHANGE FORUM

    Happiness is...

  9. #9
    fmajor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Colorado
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    259
    I'm not an expert by any stretch of the imagination, but by hubris i'll comment all the same.

    Using a very scientifiic method - comparing view area to view area out of my window - to my eyes my 65mm lens on my RB67 is not nearly as wide as my 24mm f2.8 lens on my 35mm camera (Minolta XD-11). Maybe the Mamiya 50mm would add that extra bit of width to reach the 24mm - i have the manufacturers listed angle of view for these lenses (both Mamiya RB67 lenses and Minolta Rokkor lenses).

    To my eyes, the 65mm Mamiya is very, very close to the view of my Rokkor 35mm f2.8 lens.
    Last edited by fmajor; 06-03-2011 at 02:53 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  10. #10
    David Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    near Dallas, TX USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,283
    Images
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by fmajor View Post
    To my eyes, the 65mm Mamiya is very, very close to the view of my Rokkor 35mm f2.8 lens.
    I agree. On a strictly anecdotal basis, I consider my RB 65mm to be = to a 35mm on 135 film, and the RB 50mm = to the 28mm on 135.

    I always think in terms of 9/5 to compare the RB67 to a 35mm camera. The "normal" lenses are 90mm and 50mm respectively. (I know, I know, there's a zillion threads about how this is wrong.) It's all an approximation anyway, since the aspect ratios are also different.

    Discuss ...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin