Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,569   Posts: 1,646,570   Online: 978
      
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37
  1. #21

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81
    Improper pronunciation by itself can be funny too, especially here in Germany:


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gmOTpIVxji8

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,006
    Images
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by Leigh B View Post
    "Who'da thunk it?" is an old, old phrase, meant as a joke.

    It's not proper English, but quite commonly used.

    The proper phrase would be "Who would have thought it?"

    - Leigh
    Exactly what I was going to say.
    2F/2F

    "Truth and love are my law and worship. Form and conscience are my manifestation and guide. Nature and peace are my shelter and companions. Order is my attitude. Beauty and perfection are my attack."

    - Rob Tyner (1944 - 1991)

  3. #23
    benjiboy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    U.K.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,794
    The OP obviously used the archaic past participial "thunk" for comedic effect, it is correct English but a form that's fallen out of common usage, like the phrase "in back" that is still used in the US that dates back to the seventeenth century in England and taken over to America by the first settlers that hasn't been in use in Britain for hundreds of years we say "in the back".
    Ben

  4. #24
    coigach's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Inverness-shire, Scotland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,498
    Images
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by benjiboy View Post
    The OP obviously used the archaic past participial "thunk" for comedic effect, it is correct English but a form that's fallen out of common usage, like the phrase "in back" that is still used in the US that dates back to the seventeenth century in England and taken over to America by the first settlers that hasn't been in use in Britain for hundreds of years we say "in the back".
    Am I right in thinking you are an avid BBC Radio 4 listener...?

  5. #25
    CGW
    CGW is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,797
    I can (barely) take amateur photographers but wannabe lexicographers and grammarians? Find your own site.

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by CGW View Post
    I can (barely) take amateur photographers but wannabe lexicographers and grammarians? Find your own site.
    Hilarious!

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New York City & Pontremoli, Italy
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    641
    Please pay attention! This is how you conjugate the verb 'to be':

    I be
    You be
    We be
    They be

  8. #28

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Indian Territory
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    123
    Benjiboy wrote: "The OP obviously used the archaic past participial "thunk" for comedic effect, it is correct English but a form that's fallen out of common usage,"

    That is an interesting theory, but if the O.E.D. does not find that as a probable etymology, then it is unlikely: not impossible, just unlikely.

    Today, it apparently finds application in the computer world; the meaning of which eludes me.

    At any rate, I will apologize for contributing to the thread being hijacked and yes, we should move it elsewhere.
    Geo.

  9. #29
    Sethasaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    96
    If it came from an Irishman, it's Inglish, not English.

  10. #30

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,689
    Back to original posting, I started to place an order for T-Max 400; but they wanted to charge $10 for shipping since the item is coming from a 3rd party (probably Adorama). Without free shipping, no real savings here.
    van Huyck Photo
    "Progress is only a direction, and it's often the wrong direction"

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin