Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,219   Posts: 1,532,289   Online: 909
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    370

    Yashica 124 question

    Does anyone know if some of the Yashica 124s came with the two-hole, sliding film pressure plate as opposed to the four-hole design that needed to be removed and rotated to adjust between 120 and 240 film?

    Reason I ask, I'm looking at one on the auction site. The body is labeled and has the chrome as the 124, but the photo of the pressure plate shoes the sliding version that is standard on the 124G.

    At first I thought that the rear door had just been replaced with one from a 124G, but the open/close knob on the bottom is chrome, not black as the 124G has. Could just the pressure plate have been replaced? If so, would this still work for both types of film?

    I sent a question to the seller, he said he will look into it and get back with me. I just thought some of you may be able to shed some light.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    370
    No one has any thoughts? Is this something I should be concerned with or just make the assumption that it should work?

    Not holding anyone to a definitive answer. :-)

  3. #3
    DWThomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,221
    Images
    64
    I only have a 124 G, but somewhere I got the impression the 124 designation was to indicate the camera could take 12 exposure rolls (120) or 24 exposure rolls (220). But I hardly consider myself any authority on the matter.


    This guy says a straight 124 takes either.

    DaveT

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by DWThomas View Post
    I only have a 124 G, but somewhere I got the impression the 124 designation was to indicate the camera could take 12 exposure rolls (120) or 24 exposure rolls (220). But I hardly consider myself any authority on the matter.


    This guy says a straight 124 takes either.

    DaveT
    Right, they both should take either length of film. Both have film pressure plates that you adjust, depending on which you want to use. These were different in the 124 as opposed to the 124G, and worked differently. My concern is that this particular 124 has a 124G pressure plate in it. I'm just wondering if this modification may preclude one or the other type of film.

    Guess I'll have to wait and see what the seller tells me.

  5. #5
    DWThomas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    SE Pennsylvania
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,221
    Images
    64
    OK, I see what you're saying.

    Other than the adjustment (height or pressure) for the difference in film thickness, the sliding flavor engages/disengages a plunger that tells the winding mechanism whether it's a 12 or 24 exposure. If I were designing an enhanced model that avoided taking out and flipping the plate, I would leave all the other stuff alone. That leads me to suspect the rotating one moves a tab to the other side, whereas the slider just moves the tab a ways along the same side. I would be surprised if the tab/plunger interface wasn't in the same location in both models,; e.g., either pressure plate could work, but I admit that's speculation!

    Hopefully the seller can allay your fears and you'll have a new toy!

  6. #6
    Rick A's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    north central Pa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    5,855
    Images
    32
    The main differences between the 124 and 124G are the G model has gold electrical contacts for longevity and a switch to plastic innards to lighten weight. Obviously, the straight 124 model is prefered for having metal workings and is more durable. Both models utilize 12 or 24 exposure compatability. IIRC, both use the four element lens design and are quite capable of producing high quality images.
    Rick A
    Argentum aevum
    BTW: the big kid in my avatar is my hero, my son, who proudly serves us in the Navy. "SALUTE"

  7. #7
    Brac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    625
    It was the 24 model that took only 220 (24 exp) film. The 124 & 124G take both 120 & 220. Whether there was a difference in pressure plates between the 124 & 124G I don't know, but sometimes when changing from one model to another, there are transitional models which might contain parts which were used in the earlier model but which are to be changed in the new model. But it does sound as if the camera you are interested in can cope with both film sizes, not that there's a great deal of 220 film made these days, so it will probably soon be an academic point!

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    370
    Quote Originally Posted by Brac View Post
    It was the 24 model that took only 220 (24 exp) film. The 124 & 124G take both 120 & 220. Whether there was a difference in pressure plates between the 124 & 124G I don't know, but sometimes when changing from one model to another, there are transitional models which might contain parts which were used in the earlier model but which are to be changed in the new model. But it does sound as if the camera you are interested in can cope with both film sizes, not that there's a great deal of 220 film made these days, so it will probably soon be an academic point!
    What I was hoping someone would suggest - just a transitional model, combining some of the newer components. That was one of my thoughts too.

    Thanks everyone. Will see what the seller says. If I pull the trigger, I'll update.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Saint Louis, MO
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    150
    Images
    47
    I thought mine had the sliding back plate, but I looked at the owners manual and it shows that it had the plate that had to be removed and rotated. You can download the manual here. http://mikec62.tripod.com/manuals.html
    Last edited by Too old to care; 10-17-2011 at 12:36 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: New information.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Lower Michigan, USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    370
    Well, mystery solved. The seller got back to me. Seems he sold a 124G a while back (confirmed by examining his feedback). The photo of the pressure plate was inadvertently left in the listing. Says all other photos are correct. He assured me that the camera he is currently selling has the "remove and turn" pressure plate.

    Unfortunately, it has gone higher than I hoped in price. It is a nice looking specimen though.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin