Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,461   Posts: 1,570,629   Online: 772
      
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26
  1. #21
    Velander's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    8
    I just inherited a camera collection and I don't know what I'm going to do with them. Maybe one of them would work for you. You can see them by doing a Google search for "Larry's Camera Collection", or you can just visit my home page under my profile.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    USA, Pac/NW
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    368
    EAS, "The camera can be a bit heavy and big, so long as it is good for portraits as well as still life and landscapes."


    Portraits...Still Life's...and Landscapes?
    Sounds like a bellows focusing, Mamiya TLR, with inter-changeable lenses is your answer.
    Three lenses would be a nice kit, but would cost more than $300. Probably well north of $450.

    Portraits: Get the fantastic 180mm Super. Second choice, (coin toss). I'd go with the 105mm-D/DS over the 135mm.
    Street and Still Life's: The standard 80mm, great with the close focusing bellows (for still life's) and/or a short tele above.
    Landscapes: The 65mm (cheaper), or 55mm (expensive), and of course, the standard 80mm, the fastest lens at f:2.8.
    Body: Go for a later C-220 or C-330 (denoted by 120/220 capability internally), or a C-330F.
    Lenses: Try to get the later Black vs earlier Chrome, (shutter surround). Black, Blue-Dot (shutter lever), preferred.

    So, the full-meal-deal, ($550) three lens kit would be the 55, 80, and 180-Super, w/C-330F body.
    Least expensive, ($375) but still very capable would be the 65, 80, and 135, w/C-220 or maybe a C-330 body.

    Just my two cents. Prices may vary. Patience!

    Marc
    Last edited by Marc B.; 11-18-2011 at 11:09 AM. Click to view previous post history.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    164
    Hello;
    My vote would be a Mamiya TLR with interchangeable lenses. During my high school days I took pictures for the paper, the reason the photography class existed. They would always stick me with a 4 X 5 Speed Graphic, RH10 (roll film back), and a Metz 502 with battery pack. Many great pictures of Football, Basketball, and general interest were shot. Why not spend the money on updating the Graflex instead of investing into another system? Different masks for the viewfinder can be had or made and a plexiglass insert made with lines for the wire frame finder. Just my two cents, Steven.

  4. #24

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Coimbra, Portugal
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3
    Images
    15
    I've got a Mamiya C330 Pro F with the 55mm, the 80mm and the 180mm lenses, a Rolleiflex 3.5F (with lightmeter, but having no battery it's only exact under sunlight) and a Halma 44 (size 127 film)
    I strongly recommend the Mamiya system: it's the best TLR system by far, and the 80mm f2.8 lens is superb. I travel anywhere with it, and it's great

  5. #25

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Aalen, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    592
    My fist choice would be either Rolleiflex T (I had one and loved it, payed 200€ for good condition few years ago) or Minolta Autocord (which has VERY good reputation among users) with Citizen shutter. The Tessar lens of the Rolleiflex T was reasonably sharp wide open in the center (well, it is a tessar) and got very sharp across the field at about f/8. To get better sharpness wide open you would need a planar in the Rolleiflex D, E, F models, but even the older f/3.5 versions are well above $300.

  6. #26
    MDR
    MDR is offline
    MDR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,143
    Zeiss Ikon Ikoflex with Tessar lens in good condition is nearly as good as a Rolleiflex, the lens is just as good as the Tessar on a Rolleiflex and is usually a lot cheaper than a Rolleiflex. BTW. I am a Rolleiflex and Ikoflex user love both for different reasons. The most versatile TLR would be either a Mamiya C33 (Lower price tag) or a Mamiya C220 (Lower price tag) both can be had cheaper than Mamiya's last TLR Modell the C330 and are just as good. Imho

    Dominik

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin