|
|
|
-
nikon 200-400 f4 MK1 and MK2 at infinity
Is there a definate improvement in the infinity performance of the nano coating VRII version of the lens, from it's version 1 predecessor? Thank you.
-
If it's anything like the 70-200 VR vs VRII then I'd suppose there is a pretty significant difference. However, how this will show in real-world shooting, I don't know. Better answers to follow.
"Hit 'em with a Speed Graphic"
"The camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera."
— Dorothea Lange
"Film is to digital as a symphony orchestra is to a kazoo" - Brian C. Miller
http://www.flickr.com/photos/easmithv/
RIP Kodachrome
-
Is There a Noticeable Difference on film?
 Originally Posted by EASmithV
If it's anything like the 70-200 VR vs VRII then
I'd suppose there is a pretty significant difference. However, how this will show
in real-world shooting, I don't know. Better answers to follow.
The question you should also ask, is will there be a significantly noticable
difference on film ?
You should try to test it on Velvia, to see.
Maybe you can save a significant amount of money getting the Version 1.
-
It could be a very versatile lens, providing you just use a TC14E teleconvertor. I have read horror stories of soft imaging in compositions more than 20 metres distant from camera. I wonder how much of this is technique or poor IQ of the lens itself. I wonder how it would fare at infinity landscape shots.
|
|
Adv Reply
