Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 72,533   Posts: 1,598,686   Online: 817
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    781

    Yashica Lenses, DSL and ML

    I've recently been purchasing Yashica lenses after a period buying Canon and Nikon. I believe ML are multi-coated and DSL single coated, however the DSL 50mm and 28mm give excellent results. Are any C/Y buffs familiar with how much better the ML lenses are before I spend money?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Toronto ON Canada
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    547
    I have a 50 version of each but not used them in years but from memory I never saw any difference that was noteworthy. But I did not use the camera for critical shooting, though. I'd not sweat it as I have shot with uncoated, single and multi-coated lenses and all can be very good. In a few instances, I actually preferred single coated over the multi-coated lenses and the maker said except for the coating the lenses were exactly the same in design, glass and construction. An example was some of the M42 Asahi lenses.

  3. #3
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area (Albany, California)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,442
    Images
    1
    Google the two types. I remember there is some sites that discuss the differences and the quality of some of the specific lenses. Some are great, some are dogs
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  4. #4
    Jeff L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Toronto ON
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    504
    The ML's are newer and thought to be better than the DSB's. The ML line has a very good reputation, the 21mm, 24mm and 55mm macro especially. I have a quite few ML's and find them all to be very good. I really like the 21mm.

  5. #5
    ic-racer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Midwest USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    6,479
    The ML lenses have a different formula than the DSB lenses. Many of the ML lenses are pretty good. Some ML lenses came in two different optical formulas. The 28/2.8 and 35/2.8 in particular. ( http://www.yashicaforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=1441)

    I recently got a bunch of these ML lenses as backup for my Zeiss lenses.
    Last edited by ic-racer; 02-03-2012 at 09:34 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    781
    Thanks for the help. I'll do a comparison and see whether to invest in more MLs or stay with the DSBs.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    627
    Images
    25
    I think that the DSB lenses are much like the earlier single-coated M42 mount DS lenses, only with the C/Y bayonet mount. I have had several DSB 50/1.9 lenses, and every one has had oily aperture blades. Watch for this, although in my experience, it did not affect the functionality of the lenses. I do find them a little finicky to focus, however. There are at least two versions of the DSB 28/2.8, one with a 55mm filter thread, which is not so great and also prone to oilyness, and an excellent (and very rare) version with a 58mm filter thread and an aspheric lens that is excellent and extraordinarily well-constructed. Good luck finding one, I wish that I had never sold mine because I have never seen another. There are also YUS (Yashica U S) lenses, which are similar or identical to the DSB lenses, I have found the YUS 135/2.8 to be a very nice lens and a good performer.

    Often, you can find a Yashica FX-2 kit with three DSB or YUS lenses on ebay (the 50/1.9, the 28/2.8, and the DSB or YUS 135/135) on eBay for less than you will pay for the lenses separately.

    The ML lenses have earned their good reputation. The ML 50/2 is one of my favorite lenses ever, it is a little gem and is one of the greatest bargains out there. The 50/1.7 is excellent as well, and the "kit" version, the 50/1.9, is also quite acceptable. I have also had good results from the ML Zoom 80~200/f4.

    I have a short MC zoom that I have yet to try. The MC lenses are light-weight versions of the ML lenses, I believe.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    northern england
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    781
    Quote Originally Posted by elcabezagrande View Post
    The ML 50/2 is one of my favorite lenses ever, it is a little gem and is one of the greatest bargains out there.
    I bought one of these recently and have been waiting to test it properly. The DSB 50mm 1.9 is a good performer so it will be interesting to see how they compare but I agree it's hard to focus. My enthusiasm for Yashica came from purchasing an FR, it's difficult to say why it's rapidly becoming my favourite SLR - the metal body, viewfinder readout, readily available batteries and the shutter perhaps. The frame counter is supposed to be a weakness but mine is still working. The ML lenses are rare compared to other makes and Contax glass is very expensive, so it might take a while to find what I'm looking for.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin