Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,228   Posts: 1,532,816   Online: 957
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Noctilux f/0.95

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    376
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    28
    Personally, if my aim were to shoot in low-light, I think I would prefer the sub-1000$ Voigtlander 35mm f1.2 over the Noctilux f0.95. I can handhold a 35mm lens at half the speed of a 50mm lens, effectively gaining one stop. That puts the 35mm f1.2 very close to its astronomically priced Leica brother-from-another-mother.
    And the sign said, "long haired freaky people need not apply"

  2. #12
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,215
    Images
    20
    Don't have a car myself. Not sure how many lenses.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #13
    Rol_Lei Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hamburg
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by MaximusM3 View Post
    Good question, Bill...I don't know...maybe because everyone needs a car but no one really NEEDS an $11K lens
    I don't own a car (or $11,000 lenses), but I also cetainly don't "need" a car and generally find lenses more useful...
    M6, SL, SL2, R5, P6x7, SL3003, SL35-E, F, F2, FM, FE-2, Varex IIa

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin