Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,480   Posts: 1,542,694   Online: 853
      
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 55
  1. #11
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,958
    Images
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by dynachrome View Post
    There was also an f/1.2 version
    Yeah, a gorgeous lens. And expensive and rare, and TWO POUNDS itself!
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  2. #12
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,263
    Images
    4
    Yes I have definitely noticed the KEH prices on C/Y going haywire about a year or so ago.
    I managed to get my 50 1.4 for around 225.00 (which wasn't the greatest deal considering) then shortly after they climbed to at least 300usd for bgn.
    I even made a post about it back then I think.

    If I didn't have 2 135 fl lenses already the 135 2.8 C/Y is one of the only ones under 2 bills haha.

    I really appreciate the tests and both of those Kodak films are at the top of my user list.
    I visit your flickr & blog fairly regularly so I know that even test shots will be useful.
    Thanks again Rich.

  3. #13
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,958
    Images
    1
    Ok, here's some from the rolls taken yesterday.

    First a "bokeh" test.

    This shot of my daughter taken about 2.5-3 feet away I believe f/4.0, maybe f.5.6:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Scan-12.jpg 
Views:	42 
Size:	369.9 KB 
ID:	49179

    I then left this focus in place and shot some homes across the street from where we were sitting.

    Here's the across-the-street shot in perfect focus first of all:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Scan-12.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	476.2 KB 
ID:	49180

    Here it is at the focus point of my daughter above but at the following apertures as shown in the bottom right corner of each:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f1-4+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	36 
Size:	359.0 KB 
ID:	49181

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f2-0+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	29 
Size:	345.5 KB 
ID:	49182

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f2-8+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	31 
Size:	328.5 KB 
ID:	49183

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f4-0+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	338.2 KB 
ID:	49184

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f5-6+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	17 
Size:	332.8 KB 
ID:	49185

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	f8-0+Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Sc.jpg 
Views:	20 
Size:	324.6 KB 
ID:	49186

    And now a few from the breakfast table on Tri-X all taken wide open at f/1.4:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Breakfast+Mimi+Amy+Ben+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Tri-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac.jpg 
Views:	38 
Size:	404.6 KB 
ID:	49187

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Breakfast+Mimi+Amy+Ben+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Tri-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac.jpg 
Views:	32 
Size:	402.6 KB 
ID:	49188

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Breakfast+Mimi+Amy+Ben+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Tri-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac.jpg 
Views:	33 
Size:	411.9 KB 
ID:	49189

    A some from later on that day, most taken at f/4.0 to 5.6:

    on Plus-x:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mimi+Amy+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Plus-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac+9000+Scan-12.jpg 
Views:	26 
Size:	374.8 KB 
ID:	49190

    Tail end of the Tri-X roll:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Breakfast+Mimi+Amy+Ben+ContaxRTSII+85f1-8Planar+Tri-X+HC-110dilH+9min+20C+1minAg2x+04-2012+VSmac.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	429.4 KB 
ID:	49191

    Ok, very unscientific but I hoped it helped. I had fun....
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  4. #14
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,958
    Images
    1
    And here's just a few more from the past taken using the 85/1.4 Planar (film and developer used in the image file's name):

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ben+Albany+-+Cordonices+park+with+emily+ContaxRX+85Planar+ShantouERA100+D-76+stock+7min+21C+11-2.jpg 
Views:	22 
Size:	85.0 KB 
ID:	49194

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Berkeley+Rose+Garden+with+emily+ContaxRX+85Planar+APX25+HC-110dilH+7min+21C+11-2006+15.jpg 
Views:	21 
Size:	93.5 KB 
ID:	49195

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Ben+Cordonices+ContaxRX+85Planar+Neopan400+D-76+stock+11-2006+NS+05.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	96.1 KB 
ID:	49196

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Mimi+Ben+Albany+French+Marin+Cheese+ContaxRTS+85Planar+ShantouERA100+DiXactolUltra+8min+21C+08-2.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	202.0 KB 
ID:	49197
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  5. #15
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,263
    Images
    4
    Rich,
    Again thank you so much for these.
    Does the 'ninja star" highlight rendering only show up around f/2? There is a lot of discussion on the net on the effect this has on bokeh even where there re no specular highlights in a scene.

    I'm thought the 135 f/2 had this also but I need to look into it more. I'm not sure I dig that look but it's supposed to be one of the reasons the lens renders so nicely. Doubt it would be an issue if it does become offensive to me as I could avoid that aperture in those situations.

    Gosh I will miss neopan 400 when it finally is kaput.
    Thanks again.

  6. #16
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,958
    Images
    1
    The ninja star only shows up at f/2 and most distinctly only for sharp distinct highlights usually off chrome or glass. Perfectly round when wide open and octagonal-like in other apertures.
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  7. #17
    Rol_Lei Nut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Hamburg
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Quote Originally Posted by rich815 View Post
    The ninja star only shows up at f/2 and most distinctly only for sharp distinct highlights usually off chrome or glass. Perfectly round when wide open and octagonal-like in other apertures.
    Or get hold of the Rolleiflex version of the lens for triangular apertures and highlights....

    Anyway, lovely lens (the 35mm 1.4 is *even* better).
    M6, SL, SL2, R5, P6x7, SL3003, SL35-E, F, F2, FM, FE-2, Varex IIa

  8. #18
    Richard Sintchak (rich815)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    San Francisco area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,958
    Images
    1
    So what did you decide Bruce? I'm trying so hard right now to ignore those 135/2.8 Sonnar's on KEH......
    -----------------------

    "Well, my photos are actually much better than they look..."

    Richard S.
    Albany, CA (San Francisco bay area)

    My Flickr River of photographs
    http://flickriver.com/photos/rich815...r-interesting/

    My Photography Website
    http://www.lightshadowandtone.com

  9. #19
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,348
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    444
    Bruce-

    I too had the 85 1.4 and had nothing but amazing results from it wide open and otherwise. I have some of my Cambodia stuff posted on my website that was shot with it - take a look at the Angkor Wat gallery in the Travel section, particularly images 1,2 and 3 -

    http://www.theflyingcamera.com/

    I apologize for the small size of the images on the website - it's a section I need to re-do.

  10. #20
    brucemuir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Metro DC area, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,263
    Images
    4
    Hey guys,
    they have a ninja star version for 599 on KEH so I'm debating if I should go an extra 100.00 for an MM. (just under 700)

    I was watching these on eBay and in the low 600's seems what they were going for on average.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin