Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,963   Posts: 1,523,196   Online: 829
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    165

    Nikon 1000mm f11 vs MTO-11CA

    Please detail your experiences with these 2 lenses, and which one you feel would be the better proposition overall, assuming I can get an adaptor which will allow me to use the Russian mirror lens on my film cameras. I plan on the black card and tape around the lens to increase contrast.

  2. #2
    narsuitus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    538
    Since I have no experience with the Russian mirror lens, I cannot comment on it.

    I have had years of experience with my Nikon f/11 mirror lens and have been very pleased with its performance. If I were looking for mirror lens for my Nikon camera, I would not consider any lens other than Nikon unless it had a bargain price, was optically superior, or both.

    I do not know what you mean by taping a black card around the lens to increase contrast. Would you please explain?

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345567954/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/5289334100/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/7345561710/

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/11336821@N00/208458239/
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Nikon 1000mm 11 sml.JPG   Nikon 1000mm 31 sml.JPG   scenic 067sml.jpg   11052603b sml.JPG  

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA., U.S.A.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    228

    I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

    I can't believe that a Russian lens would be better than a top-of-the-line
    Nikkor lens.

    I used to have a Celestron 1250 mm lens. It didn't work well, for photography.

    I now own the Nikkor 1000 mm mirror lens !

    I use it on a Canon EOS cameras, admittedly the metering is a bit spotty,
    ( pun intended ), but it's super sharp.

    Surprisingly, I used the same lens with a Canon T-90 & that camera could
    do stop-down metering much more accurately.

    I love this lens !

    The only better version of this lens would be finding a Contax Zeiss,
    Mirror lens & using a lens adapter.

  4. #4
    Andrew K's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    499
    I can only comment on the MTO

    - mine is very sharp
    - it vignettes noticably - a good 1 stops from centre to the edge of the frame
    - contrast is lower than a optical lens, but not much of a problem, as I tend to use the lens in sunlight so the lower contrast is not a problem
    - build quality is very good - mine was made around 1990

    I've used mine with Canon FD and EOS film and digital cameras

    For me the decision which one to uy would epend on several factors - price, how often the lens was going to be used, adn for what purpose. For me, the price was right, and for the occasional shot it's a fun lens to have
    A camera is only a black box with a hole in it....

    my blog...some film, some digital http://andrewk1965.wordpress.com/



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin