|
|
|
-
 Originally Posted by cliveh
Have Leitz ever made a camera which is an improvement on the M2 in terms of design and function? If so, in what way?
Leicaflex SL. Better metering, better viewfinder, easier to hold still, no need for auxiliary viewfinders.
-
A cheeky response, but true! I guess I'm not sure what the original poster was getting at. Would an M2 successor with the same simple framelines, but maybe with a meter, crank rewind, same frame counter be the goal? No such camera exists.
 Originally Posted by E. von Hoegh
Leicaflex SL. Better metering, better viewfinder, easier to hold still, no need for auxiliary viewfinders.
-
 Originally Posted by Nick Merritt
A cheeky response, but true! I guess I'm not sure what the original poster was getting at. Would an M2 successor with the same simple framelines, but maybe with a meter, crank rewind, same frame counter be the goal? No such camera exists.
It's a case of a poorly posed question.
I like rangefinders, I've had a couple M3s, but an SLR is a more versatile camera for me. The original Lecaflex lineup are the only SLRs Leica made that I would consider owning as a day to day user, they lost it with the R3 and never got it back with susequent models.
-
I never could understood Leica. Sure, the M series lenses were sharper than the Zeiss lenses on my Contax 139 because they didn't have to design them around a mirror. The problem was, for the price of a Leica I would rather have invested my money into a medium format camera.
-
 Originally Posted by Alan Gales
I never could understood Leica. Sure, the M series lenses were sharper than the Zeiss lenses on my Contax 139 because they didn't have to design them around a mirror. The problem was, for the price of a Leica I would rather have invested my money into a medium format camera.
The difference between the rangefinder lenses and the SLR lenses is really only in the wide angle lenses. Even between the R Leica lenses and M series lenses. Once you get over 50mm in focal length, those differences (due to the retrofocus design) vanish.
-
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
-
I was reading a speech by Willy Fleckhaus, art director for Twen in Germany in the '60s
His topic was "Overdesigned" and I kept thinking about the Leica M2 when reading the explanation of the topic...
"I am here speaking about over-designing. I heard this phrase in America and was very impressed with it, because it is not possible to translate it into German."
-
 Originally Posted by Bill Burk
...Willy Fleckhaus.... "I am here speaking about over-designing. I heard this phrase in America and was very impressed with it, because it is not possible to translate it into German."
That's seriously funny, Bill! Engineers have a very special status in Germany, from what I understand.
The cameras may be engineered to oblivion. A few years ago, when I first tested a Leica, I was a little bit perplexed that I couldn't tell much of a difference between a 50mm Summicron and a Pentax 50mm lens, judging from prints I made on a Leitz V35 enlarger. Same film, same developer, same paper, same contrast... and basically the same resulting print.
But, and this is a big deal for me, I absolutely love using the Leica, and by comparison the Pentax SLRs (and many others I have tried including Nikon, Canon, Olympus, etc), are downright clunky by comparison. It is just an elegant piece of machinery that puts me in a state of mind that is more conducive to creating good negatives than any other camera I have tried. It's a matter of feeling at one with the camera.
I realize that not everybody will like a Leica camera. But to me, my M2 is a dream machine, and I cannot imagine a better tool.
"...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera".
- Yousuf Karsh
"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit".
- Aristotle
-
 Originally Posted by E. von Hoegh
It's a case of a poorly posed question.
I like rangefinders, I've had a couple M3s, but an SLR is a more versatile camera for me. The original Lecaflex lineup are the only SLRs Leica made that I would consider owning as a day to day user, they lost it with the R3 and never got it back with susequent models.
Not even with the R6-2..?
-
 Originally Posted by rolleiman
Not even with the R6-2..?
"never got it back with subsequent models"
-
 Originally Posted by Bill Burk
I was reading a speech by Willy Fleckhaus, art director for Twen in Germany in the '60s
His topic was "Overdesigned" and I kept thinking about the Leica M2 when reading the explanation of the topic...
"I am here speaking about over-designing. I heard this phrase in America and was very impressed with it, because it is not possible to translate it into German."
No need of translation, it's inherent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siemens-Halske_Sh.III
|
|