analogic cameras with no (or with little) vibrations of the mirror:a list!

[BMbikerider]

Yes but the contax rts are very expensive cameras!...
I was thinking on a yashica body or a pentax k1000
Ciao

I would go for the Pentax any time. So much more popular and there are plenty around, what's more they are mechanical and will be repairable. The FX series are electronic and the possibility of getting them repaired is slim.

[bdial]

Vibration is there, but for most purposes not a real problem;

[rich815]

Contax RX

[summicron1]

the leicaflex sl and sl2 had mechanically damped mirrors in an attempt to make an slr with as little vibration as a leica M rangefinder -- they came darn close, if my example is any indication. Never tried that penny trick.

[peters8]

Which is the best yashica body in your opinion ?...or at least the body less noisy!!!thanks

[Les Sarile]

Best Yashica . . . Rangfinder, M42 mount, Yashica/Contax mount?
The Yashica FR received a very good review from Popular Photography, Jan 1979 issue.

[E. von Hoegh]

You can always go with any body that has a mirror lockup feature. Vibration is rarely an issue; where vibration begins to matter is in close up/macro work, and sometimes it will set up a resonance in a lightweight tripod.

[blockend]

The original FR is a great camera.

[lxdude]

You can always go with any body that has a mirror lockup feature. Vibration is rarely an issue; where vibration begins to matter is in close up/macro work, and sometimes it will set up a resonance in a lightweight tripod.

Well, that and telephoto work. And it's generally more a problem at slower shutter speeds, like 1/30 to 1/2. Depending on the (35mm) camera, I found 1/15 or 1/8 to be worst.

[Sirius Glass]

How about a medium format [MF] camera that does not have mirror bounce?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CkKcbyh2CrA