Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,716   Posts: 1,514,794   Online: 828
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    sparx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Norfolk UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    376

    Using 2x converters

    I've been trying to get my hands on a fast prime lens of between 85mm & 120mm for my OM system for portrait work with no luck. I do have a 50mm f1.8 and a 2x converter.
    I know that using the converter will lose me 2 stops of light which isn't a big problem but will it also lose me 2 stops aperture?
    I don't think it should. If anything I think I should actually get a shallower depth of field as I will be focusing at a greater distance and, if I remember correctly, DOF is affected by aperture, distance to subject & focal length of lens. Is this correct or am I doing dodgy science?
    [size=1]the all new darkplanet photoblog[/size][size=1]
    [/size]

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,134
    Images
    20
    The f:stop is equal to the focal length of the lens divided by the physical size of the aperture. If you add a 2x converter, you are doubling the focal length of the lens but the physical size of the aperture stays the same, so your 50/1.8 lens becomes a 100/3.6 lens. Plug the numbers into a DOF table and see what you get.

    Doublers also usually add some transmissive light loss--often around 1/2 stop. You don't notice it if you are metering through the lens, but if you use a handheld meter or non-TTL auto flash, you might want to test it, so that you can take it into account.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,042
    Davids answered this one better than I could. Remember to make sure the lens you get fits the converter or the glass in your lens might hit the glass in your converter when you focus OUCH!!

  4. #4
    Helen B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Hell's Kitchen, New York, USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,557
    Images
    27
    If you can find a 2x converter that goes in front of the lens you will maintain the f/1.8 as far as focussing goes - ie a 50 mm f/1.8 lens will turn into a 100 mm f/1.8 lens, albeit of less-than-perfect optical quality. There will be some extra transmission loss, as with a behind-the-lens converter, but that doesn't affect depth of field. The difficulty would probably be in finding such a converter that didn't vignette with a 50 mm lens. A lot of tele-converters were made for Super 8 mm movie cameras with non-interchangeable zooms, and they are available second-hand. New ones of reasonable quality are fairly expensive. The Century one, with a 58 mm mounting thread, is 500 bucks new.

    Best,
    Helen

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Montgomery, Il/USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,967
    and one of questionable quality 100-200 from your local digicam supplier. use probably less than $50

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    726
    Olympus made a rather nice f2.8 100mm lens. It's slower than your 50mm, but faster than the 50 + teleconverter and the quality will be much better.

    David.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    1,638
    Images
    5
    Good Evening, Sparx,

    David's comment above reminds to mention that Olympus also made (makes?) an absolutely superb f2 100mm lens for the OM series cameras; it's probably the sharpest lens I have; some claim, though, that's it's too sharp for portraits.

    Konical

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,949
    Images
    1
    one good aspect of teleconvertors (hope I've got this right as I own one but never use it as such, only as a extension tube cause it's guts unscrew and can be removed!) is, you maintain the minimum focusing distance of the prime lens, thus effectively increasing the magnification ratio obtainable. Something like that



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin